Deficiency Index

Alliance Health at West Acres

Brockton, Massachusetts · CCN 225259

14 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
63
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
138
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
County
Plymouth
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 36 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Sep 19, 2025

416 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.693.89
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.23—
Annual nurse turnover32.4%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD743.8%E850.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B16.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 63 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Alliance Health at West Acres, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for two of two test trays. Findings include:During the initial resident screening on 9/16/25, the survey team identified the following concerns expressed by residents about food palatability:-Resident #53 said the food was often served cold.-Resident #103 said the food was cold 90% of the time, but the staff will reheat it, if you ask.-Resident #37 said the food was always cold and gross.On 9/17/25 at 11:15 A.M., 10 Residents attended the Resident Council Meeting. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 19, 2025

    Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure emergency water supply was discarded and replenished prior to the expiration date.2. Maintain safe and clean equipment in three out of three kitchenettes.Findings include:Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 29, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections when the facility was currently experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Perform a COVID-19 related investigation and conduct contact tracing for a single new resident case to prevent, to the extent possible, the onset and spread of infection and ensure staff and resident COVID-19 surveillance line listings were maintained; 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 27, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement care plans for three Residents (#7, #55, and #8), out of a sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #7, to implement a nose picking behavior care plan; 2. For Resident #55, to apply Geri-sleeves (a device that helps protect extremities from abrasion, bruises, and skin tears), as ordered; and 3. For Resident #8, a. to apply Geri-sleeves, and b. to implement a fall mat (a device used to reduce risk of injury from impact) on the floor as ordered and ensure the Resident's bed was in a low position. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jul 27, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (#60, #7, #37, and #312), out of a sample of 25 residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #60, to implement a physician's order not to have straws; 2. For Resident #7, to document weekly skin checks accurately; 3. For Resident #37, to ensure nursing implemented new physician's orders and implemented the physician's order review policy as required; and 4. For Resident #312, to implement a physician's order for an ace wrap. Findings include: 1. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 63 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 19, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Aug 29, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2023Standard12 findings
  • Oct 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 15, 2020Standard8 findings
  • Oct 26, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard8 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • May 9, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 20, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 9, 2012—2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2010—4 findings
  • Sep 24, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction