Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Leominster

Leominster, Massachusetts · CCN 225038

15 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
59
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
133
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Worcester
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Apr 29, 2026

194 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.023.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.32—
Annual nurse turnover42.9%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1785.0%E315.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 59 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6042×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6101×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6581×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Leominster, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 26, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from abuse by a staff member, when on 04/04/23, at approximately 5:10 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 engaged in a verbally abusive altercation with Resident #1, that took place in the main dining room and the main reception area, that was witnessed by a visitor and two staff members. CNA #1 yelled and directed profanity at Resident #1, who became visibly upset, progressively more agitated and was screaming and crying during the altercation. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Apr 26, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had Alzheimer's disease and was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in Resident #1's Plans of Care related to Dementia, Cognition, Communication and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), when on 04/04/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1's interaction with Resident #1 during the dinner time meal was argumentative and aggressive, which conflicted with approaches identified in his/her plans of care that were to be utilized by staff to ensure his/her needs were met, and as a result Resident #1 behaviors escalated from being irritated to becoming upset, frustrated and angry, he/she refused assistance with care… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF658Nov 22, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was admitted with a surgical wound to his/her left lower extremity, the Facility failed to ensure that nursing provided care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice related to surgical care needs and wound monitoring. Resident #2 was readmitted to the Facility after undergoing surgical repair of left patella (kneecap) fracture, he/she also required the use of an immobilizer brace to help stabilize his/her left leg. However, there were no physician's orders related to monitoring Resident #2's left leg surgical wound site, and no documentation to support wound care assessments were completed by nursing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Aug 21, 2025

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures to ensure residents/residents' representatives were educated on benefits and potential side effects of immunizations, ensure the medical record contained documented consent or refusal of the pneumococcal immunization for four Residents out of five sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy for Residents' dated 7/8/25 indicated the following:-Education is provided to the resident and/or representative regarding benefits and side effects or risks and a consent is signed. -Each resident should be offered pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF908Aug 21, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer door was functioning properly resulting in ice build-up on the freezer floor and frost covering food product inside the freezer.Findings includeDuring the initial kitchen walkthrough on 8/19/25 at 7:15 A.M., the surveyor opened the walk-in freezer door, the floor of the freezer near the door was covered in ice and was slippery. Next to the door, food products were covered in a thick layer of frost. The frost was piled up from the floor and reached the height of the door covering food product on the shelf next to it. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 59 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Oct 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Apr 26, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 2, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Nov 22, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 3, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Aug 29, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 4, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 14, 2015Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • May 27, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 24, 2013—1 finding
  • May 7, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 4, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction