Deficiency Index

Wingate at Silver Lake

Kingston, Massachusetts · CCN 225544

24 surveys since 2012, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
63
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
164
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Plymouth
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Mar 25, 2025

594 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.303.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover38.3%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1460.9%E834.8%F14.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 63 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Wingate at Silver Lake, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 3, 2022

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility 1. Failed to handle ready to eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination; 2. Failed to have soap available at the hand washing station resulting in staff returning to food preparation without performing proper hand hygiene; 3. Failed to properly store frozen food items to prevent contamination in the walk in freezer; 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Mar 25, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#97, #51, and #83), out of a total sample of 30 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #97, to implement treatments from the wound consultant physician for a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin) on the right foot; 2. For Resident #51, to implement a treatment that included an antimicrobial wash for eight months to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) on the coccyx (tailbone, area at the base of the spine); and 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 25, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To implement an infection surveillance plan to identify, track, and monitor for infection; and 2. For Resident #77, to provide hand hygiene prior to meals and after the Resident handled his/her indwelling urinary catheter bag. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Feb 8, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, for one Resident (#57) of 29 sampled residents, the facility failed to monitor the Resident's fluid intake to ensure that he/she was not exceeding the physician ordered fluid restriction while maintaining adequate hydration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Hydration (Intake and Output Monitoring), dated as revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -When a Provider orders a fluid restriction due to specific clinical condition, close monitoring of fluid intake will be provided to maintain adequate hydration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF730Feb 8, 2024

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least every 12 months for 3 of 3 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) files reviewed. Findings include: During an interview on 2/8/24 at 9:34 A.M., the Human Resource Director (HRD) said she maintains the personnel files for all staff. The surveyor requested personnel files for three CNAs, including CNA #7, CNA #8, and CNA #9. Review of CNA #7's personnel file indicated she was hired on 5/9/2022, and she did not have an annual review in 2023. Review of CNA #8's personnel file indicated he was hired on 7/19/2019. His last completed annual review was completed 2021-2022, and he did not have an annual review in 2023. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 63 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 1, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Nov 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Nov 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • May 3, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Aug 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 3, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 13, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 20, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 22, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jul 1, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Feb 12, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 2, 2013—4 findings
  • Sep 11, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2012—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction