Chestnut Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC
East Longmeadow, Massachusetts · CCN 225303
18 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 83
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 135
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- VANTAGE CARE
- County
- Hampden
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
- Ownership changed
- In the last 12 months
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jul 16, 2026
116 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.63 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.30 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.3% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1657.1% | E517.9% | F13.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B310.7% | C310.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6372×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F7592×
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Chestnut Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF638Sep 23, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff completed quarterly review Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 23 residents (#3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #16, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #27, #32, #42, and #43), out of a total of 29 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual indicated the Quarterly MDS Assessment must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-refers to the last day of the observation period that the assessment covers for the resident). 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 20, 2025
Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that [NAME] #1 wore a hair restraint when preparing and cooking food, increasing the risk for food contamination. 2. Monitor the final internal temperature for cooked foods prior to serving the food to residents, increasing the residents' risks for acquiring foodborne illnesses. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 20, 2025
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice to prevent contamination and the spread of infections for four Residents (#276, #113, #63 and #70) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1) For Resident #276, the facility failed to ensure that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: items such as gowns and gloves worn to prevent the spread of infection) was worn in the Resident's room when the Resident was on Contact Precautions (measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) for Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff: a spore forming toxin that can develop in the intestines after antibiotic… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726Mar 14, 2024
Based on interview, record and document review, the facility failed to provide competent nursing staff to care for one Resident (#16), out of one applicable resident, out of a total sample of 24 residents, who required removal of a urinary stent (a thin flexible tube that holds the ureter open for the flow of urine) in the facility. Specifically, the facility had no evidence that its Licensed Nursing Staff had the competency and skills required to provide care and services for residents with urinary stents when Nurse (#6) was allowed to remove Resident #16's urinary stent without the guidance of any facility policies and procedures. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Sep 23, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessments for three Residents (#23, #262, and #162), out of a total of 29 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete an annual assessment for one Resident (#23) and admission assessments for two Residents (#262 and #162) as required. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual indicated both the Annual and the Admission MDS Assessments must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD- refers to the last day of the observation period that the assessment covers for the resident). 1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 83 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2025Standard8 findings
- Dec 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Standard7 findings
- May 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 23, 2022Standard10 findings
- Jan 7, 2020Standard10 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Sep 28, 2018Standard9 findings
- May 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jun 29, 2016Standard9 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 30, 2015Standard3 findings
- Apr 2, 2014Standard1 finding · 1 harm
- May 23, 2012—5 findings
- Jun 20, 2011—1 finding
- Apr 28, 2011—8 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 18, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction