Life Care Center of Bridgeton
Bridgeton, Missouri · CCN 265345
28 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 141
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 91
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
- County
- St. Louis
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 4, 2026
158 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.32 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.38 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 68.2% | 60.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $21,801 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3151.7% | E2033.3% | F58.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C23.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6774×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Bridgeton, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 17, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to follow facility policies and professional nursing standards for one resident with a gastrostomy feeding tube (g-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and was noted to have a change in condition. Staff failed to document the resident's change in condition and their assessments of the resident and failed to notify the resident's physician of the change in condition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF610Jul 11, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate an allegation of misappropriation and prevent potential further misappropriation in accordance with the facility policy when staff continued to work after the allegation was reported (Resident #4). The census was 69. Review of the facility Protection of Residents: Reducing the Threat of Abuse & Neglect policy, reviewed on 5/16/20 and revised on 8/10/21, showed: Introduction: -To minimize the threat of abuse and/or neglect, nursing homes must incorporate clear cut policies and practices that demonstrate a hardline, zero-tolerance approach to resident abuse. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 11, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff routinely assessed and monitored one resident's pressure ulcer ulcer for 21 days after it was identified on 5/31/22, and first assessed on 6/1/22, as a Stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister.). On 6/22/22, the pressure ulcer was larger, had 95% slough (yellow or white tissue that adheres to the ulcer bed in strings or thick clumps, or is mucinous), and was identified as an unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar: Known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar.) The resident also had two more Stage II pressure ulcers that were… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 16, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents remained free from pressure ulcers and to assess the resident's skin accurately to show the current status of the resident's pressure ulcers, ensure there were treatment orders and interventions implemented for one resident (Resident #276) and also failed to follow the resident's care plan and physician's orders to prevent further breakdown for two sampled residents (Residents #25 and #379) out of 9 reviewed residents. The census was 82. The administrator was notified on 6/30/21 at 2:30 P.M., of the past non-compliance which occurred through 6/19/20. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Feb 28, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services with the appropriate certification, when a consultant Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time with the facility. The census was 86. Review of the facility's certified dietary manager job description, undated, showed: -License and certification: Must have completed an approved Certified Dietary Manager course. Must maintain an active certification. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:53 A.M., the Dietary Director said she has her required qualifications but did not have a physical copy of the documentation. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 141 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 4, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jul 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 30, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Feb 28, 2025Standard12 findings
- Dec 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2024Standard12 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Oct 17, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2022Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 1, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 16, 2021Standard26 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2019Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2018Standard19 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 13, 2017Standard5 findings
- Sep 16, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 25, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jul 14, 2014Standard5 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—7 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 28, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 13, 2011—13 findings
- Jul 25, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction