Deficiency Index

Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Sanford, North Carolina · CCN 345532

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
143
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING
County
Lee · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

May 5, 2025

553 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.173.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.31—
Annual nurse turnover70.5%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.8%K25.6%L—
Actual harmG38.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2363.9%E513.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.8%C12.8%
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 143 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8673×

    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Liberty Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Feb 9, 2023

    Based on record review, observation and interviews with Orthopedic Physician Assistant (PA), Wound Nurse, Wound Physician, Medical Director (MD) #2, Director of Nursing (DON) #2, Administrator #2, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #2 and family, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer, protect Resident #16's skin under an immobilizer used following a fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint), perform skin checks under the immobilizer and assess skin. At the first orthopedic follow up appointment, an abrasion was identified. Orders were given to pad an abrasion and consult with a wound physician. The orders were not implemented. Skin checks continued not to be done following the identification of the pressure ulcer. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF835Feb 9, 2023

    Based on record review and Administrator #1 and Director of Nursing (DON) #1 interviews the facility administration failed to have effective systems in place to prevent, identify, assess, treat, and manage residents with and at risk for pressure sores. This failure resulted in Resident #16 developing an avoidable abrasion under her left leg immobilizer identified on 09/06/22 at an orthopedic consult visit. The abrasion went untreated and area deteriorated into an unstageable pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) on 9/13/22. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Feb 9, 2023

    Based on record review and staff, Wound Nurse, Director of Nursing (DON) #2, Medical Director (MD) #2, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #2 interviews, the facility failed to notify the MD #2 or NP #2 that Resident #16's developed an abrasion to her left lateral calf under her immobilizer on 9/6/22 resulting in no assessment or treatment until 9/13/22 when the area was discovered as an unstageable pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 9, 2023

    Based on staff family, emergency room (ER) Physician, Medical Director #2, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident from injury of unknown origin (right proximal tibia/fibula fracture) resulting in physical harm. This was for 1 (Resident #16) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses of Dementia, Congestive Heart failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #16's care plan included a care plan for osteoporosis with a risk for fractures dated last revised on 7/9/21. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF626Feb 9, 2023

    Based on record review and Hospital Case Manager, Ombudsman, Business Office Manager, Regional Director, Former Administrator, and current Administrator interviews, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility following a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospital transfer. Resident #106 was medically stable to return on [DATE] when the facility refused to readmit the resident. The resident remained in the hospital until [DATE] where she expired. Based on the reasonable person concept a resident transferred to the hospital for an acute condition expects to return to their home at the facility following stabilization at the hospital. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 143 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Standard4 findings
  • May 5, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jul 6, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 9, 2023Standard and complaint22 findings · 6 harm
  • Feb 17, 2022Standard and complaint23 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2020Standard and complaint23 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Jul 31, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 6, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 8, 2018Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 12, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 20, 2017Standard11 findings
  • Jan 29, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Dec 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 28, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 19, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction