Deficiency Index

Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation

Asheville, North Carolina · CCN 345010

29 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
166
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
77
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ASCENT HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
Buncombe
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jul 15, 2026

117 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.283.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover60.5%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG38.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1852.9%E514.7%F411.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B411.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 166 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8673×

    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

  • F6382×

    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 1, 2022

    Based on observations, record reviews and staff, resident, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision and a safe smoking environment 1 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a documented history of smoking with oxygen in use at another facility and was assessed as being safe to smoke unsupervised. On 10/25/22 the Director of Nursing intervened twice and removed the oxygen tank off the back of Resident #1's wheelchair as he was going out to smoke and provided education both times. No other interventions were initiated, and Resident #1 continued to smoke without supervision. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF550Jan 28, 2022

    Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity by not providing showers, bathing, transfers, and incontinence care resulting in residents expressing feelings of being: helpless, dirty, rank, embarrassed, angry, terrible, fed up, sad, treated like a dog, smelly, and forgotten about. This affected 5 of 5 (Residents #9, #39, #28, #13, and #360) sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Resident #9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 was cognitively intact and required extensive to total assistance of 1 staff member for bathing and personal hygiene. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF725Jan 28, 2022

    Based on observations, record reviews, interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to assure preferred choices were honored for bathing and requests for transfer in and out of bed; failed to assure consistent showers were provided for residents dependent on staff and as a result of these failures residents expressed feeling that included being helpless and forgotten about. The facility also failed to implement, develop and/or complete baseline and comprehensive care plans and invite residents and their representative to care plan meetings. The facility failed to timely complete and/or transmit comprehensive, quarterly, and significant change Minimum Data Set assessments. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 10, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, Psychiatric Physician's Assistant interview, and the Medical Director interview the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident to be free from abuse. Resident #1 was found bleeding with a laceration to her upper lip, and a bruise to her right index finger and hand. Resident #2 had struck Resident #1 with the bed adjustment remote control causing the laceration to Resident #1's lip and pulled a ring from Resident #1's right index finger. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse (Resident #2). Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), panic disorder, depression, and anxiety. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Dec 16, 2022

    Based on record review and interviews with the Medical Director and staff, the facility failed to notify the physician a resident's pain was not controlled after the administration of pain medication. The resident called emergency medical services and was evaluated for abdominal pain and diagnosed with acute cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder) that required admission to the hospital for the surgical removal of the gallbladder for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization s (Resident #270). The findings included: Resident #270 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a history of cervical spine trauma and quadriplegia. Resident #270 was discharged to the hospital on 11/22/22 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 166 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 15, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 9, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 7, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Aug 10, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 27, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 16, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 1, 2022Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • May 5, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Standard and complaint24 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 7, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 22, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 25, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 3, 2017Standard5 findings · 4 harm
  • May 20, 2016Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Aug 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2015Standard and complaint23 findings
  • Sep 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Dec 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 26, 2013—10 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 1, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction