Las Alturas Nursing & Transitional Care Brownsvill
Brownsville, Texas · CCN 745049
7 surveys since 2024, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 21
- Surveys
- 7
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 122
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Cameron
- Medicare-certified since
- 2024
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 24, 2026
138 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.31 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.24 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,434 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J17.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1392.9% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Las Alturas Nursing & Transitional Care Brownsvill, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 12, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident#1 received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 02/12/2025 and was found by the police department approximately 2700 feet (0.5 mile) away from the facility. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 02/12/2025 and ended on 02/13/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could prevent residents from receiving appropriate supervision which could lead to residents sustaining serious injury, harm, or death. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 27, 2026
Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 unit refrigerators, 1 of 1 dry pantry storage unit refrigerator and 1 of 1 kitchen walk in pantry walk in pantry WP# 1 and maintain equipment in proper condition reviewed for storage, preparation, and sanitation. The facility failed to utilize proper personal hygiene practices the appropriate use of gloves to prevent contamination of food while preparing pureed food and plating food to be served to residents.The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were educated on calibrating thermometers.The facility failed to ensure items in the refrigerators and freezers were labeled and dated.The facility failed to… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 27, 2026
Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving abuse was reported immediately within two hours after the allegation was made to the State Agency in accordance with State Law and failed to report to the local law enforcement agency for 2 (Resident #14 and Resident #29) out of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. 1.The facility failed to report an abuse incident involving Resident #14 that occurred on 08/15/25 to the state agency. 2.The facility failed to report an abuse incident involving Resident #29 that occurred on 08/22/25 to the state agency within 2 hours after resident stated he had a fall. 3.The facility failed to report an incident involving Resident #14 and that occurred on 08/15/2026 to the local law enforcement agency. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Aug 27, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 2 of 8 (Resident #109 and Resident #76) residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1.The facility failed to post an Oxygen sign indicating Resident #109 received oxygen on 8/25/2026. 2.The facility failed to post an Oxygen sign indicating Resident #76 received oxygen on 8/25/2026. These deficient practices could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of fire hazards by not posting oxygen signs outside the residents' rooms. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF711Aug 27, 2026
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #76, Resident #83 and Resident#30) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #76, Resident #83 and Resident#30's low air loss mattress order was in the electronic chart. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information records. Findings included: 1. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 21 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jun 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 12, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction