Deficiency Index

Lafayette Center

Franconia, New Hampshire · CCN 305077

15 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
75
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
72
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Grafton · rural
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 16 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in New Hampshire.

Last survey on record

Jun 24, 2026

138 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.583.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.69—
Annual nurse turnover54.8%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$50,164 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2468.6%E38.6%F25.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B514.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 75 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lafayette Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 27, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a final sample of 16 residents. The lack of treatment orders over a six day period resulted in a small open area that worsened into an Unstageable pressure area. (Resident identifiers is #158). Findings include: Review on 5/23/25 of Resident #158's admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/3/25 revealed that Resident #158 admitted to the facility on 2/2025 and under Section M - Skin Conditions was coded in item M0210 Unhealed Pressure Ulcers/Injuries as No (indicating that the Resident had no pressure ulcers during the 7 look-back… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 24, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for laundry services, failed to update their water management program to include information identified during a recent water infection control risk assessment, and failed to identify other potential risk areas in an effort to minimize the risk of Legionella that had the potential to effect the facility census of 58 residents.Findings include:Review on 6/24/26 of the CDC website titled Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) Appendix D-Linen and Laundry management, retrieved from : https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/laundry.html, revised on 3/27/20, revealed, .Best practice for linen (and Laundry) handling: .Always launder soiled linens… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 27, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for 2 of 2 residents observed for wound care and failed to develop a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella that had the potential to effect the facility census of 56 residents who resided at the facility. (Resident Identifiers are #32 and #158). Findings include: Resident #32 Observation on 5/23/25 at approximately 12:00 p.m. with Staff G (Infection Preventionist/ Wound Care Nurse) and Staff D (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) performing wound care for Resident #32 revealed the following: Staff G gathered their supplies outside of the room and placed them on a clip board without cleaning the clipboard or placing a clean field barrier. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF881Jun 24, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their system for monitoring antibiotic use for 5 of 7 resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Resident identifiers are #6, #7, #35, #45 and #60.)Findings include:Review on 6/24/26 of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, revised on 6/2025, revealed .iii. The facility uses .updated McGeer criteria.to define infections.Nursing will monitor the initiation of antibiotics on residents and conduct an antibiotic time out within 48-72 [hours] of antibiotic therapy to monitor the response to the antibiotic and review laboratory results and will consult with the practitioner to determine if the antibiotic is to continue or if adjustments need to be made based on the findings.Review on 6/24/26 of LOEB… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Mar 20, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 5 of 21 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident Identifiers are #24, #27, #31, #47 and #49). Findings include: Resident #49 Interview on 3/15/23 at 11:48 a.m. with Resident #49 revealed that Resident #49 does have pain and takes pain medication as needed. Review on 3/17/23 of Resident #49 March Medication Administration Record revealed that Resident #49 received Acetaminophen 650 milligrams (mg) for pain on 3/2/23, 3/13/23, 3/14/23 and 3/17/23. Further review revealed that Acetaminophen with Codeine 300-30mg was administered on 3/3/23, 3/4/23, 3/5/23, 3/9/23 and 3/16/23. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 75 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 24, 2026Standard6 findings
  • May 27, 2025Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 16, 2024Complaint5 findings
  • May 15, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Mar 20, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Apr 1, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Jun 3, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 27, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jul 31, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2013—3 findings
  • May 8, 2013—6 findings
  • Apr 26, 2012—5 findings · 1 harm
  • May 5, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction