Kirkland Village
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania · CCN 395916
18 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 36
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Northampton
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 18, 2026
264 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.71 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.30 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.9% | 31.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,069 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J111.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D888.9% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6381×
Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
- F6921×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Kirkland Village, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 18, 2026
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision to monitor a resident's location and prevent an elopement (unauthorized departure from the facility) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. The incident has been identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Elopement, last reviewed on December 29, 2025, revealed that staff were to monitor residents to prevent elopement. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Sep 12, 2024
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a significant weight loss for one of 12 sampled residents. (Resident 11) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Change in Medical Condition, dated August 29, 2024, revealed that staff were to provide timely notification to the resident's representative of significant changes to the resident's physical status. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 had diagnoses that included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Sep 12, 2024
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 12 sampled residents. (Resident 20) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 20 had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and heart failure. On June 14, 2024, a physician ordered that staff obtain a daily weight for the resident. A review of Resident 20's weights revealed that there was no documented evidence to support a weight was obtained on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, 2024. In an interview on September 12, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., the Administrator confirmed there was no documentation to support that weights were obtained by staff or refused by Resident 20 on the previously mentioned dates. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692Sep 12, 2024
Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess a significant weight change for one of 12 sampled residents. (Resident 11) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Nutrition Risk Identification, last reviewed August 29, 2024, revealed that the nursing or dietary department would identify residents with a weight loss of five percent total body weight in a 30 day period and a dietician would complete a nutritional evaluation and recommend any changes needed to aid the resident's return to optimal nutritional status. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Sep 12, 2024
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement transmission based droplet precautions and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of infection for two of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 15, 23) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Covid-19 PPE Policy, last reviewed on August 29, 2024, revealed that staff was to wear cleanable or disposable eye wear, non-sterile, disposable isolation gowns, respirator type face masks, and gloves, which were donned and doffed when entering and exiting patients' room and were not to be reused. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 36 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 18, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 12, 2024Standard4 findings
- Oct 26, 2023Standard4 findings
- Oct 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 24, 2021Standard1 finding
- Nov 10, 2020Standard2 findings
- Jun 6, 2019Standard2 findings
- May 17, 2018Standard1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jun 15, 2017Standard1 finding
- May 19, 2016Standard2 findings
- Sep 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jun 25, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jul 31, 2014Standard2 findings
- Jan 14, 2014—1 finding
- Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 19, 2012—5 findings
- Jun 3, 2011—4 findings
- Mar 8, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Willowbrooke Ctskdcarectr Atnormandy Farms EstatesBlue Bell1 harm finding
- Stoneridge Poplar RunMyerstownno harm findings
- Willowbrooke Court-SouthamptonSouthampton1 harm finding
- Heinz Transitional Rehabilitation UnitWilkes-Barreno harm findings
- Allied Services Transitional Rehab UnitScranton2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction