Kings Daughters Community Health & Rehab
Staunton, Virginia · CCN 495344
21 surveys since 2010, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 194
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 18
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 117
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- AVARDIS HEALTH
- County
- Staunton City
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
May 15, 2026
178 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.67 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.6% | 53.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $61,711 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K44.8% | L11.2% |
| Actual harm | G67.2% | H11.2% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4554.2% | E1922.9% | F78.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6414×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Kings Daughters Community Health & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF610Apr 17, 2024
Based on staff interview, resident interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, while investigations were in progress, and the facility staff lacked the knowledge of the need to protect the resident if abuse is reported and/or witnessed. The facility conducted inadequate investigations and removed protective measures that were implemented following the allegation prior to a conclusion being reached regarding the abuse allegations, which had the potential to expose residents on 3 of 3 nursing units to abuse. Immediate Jeopardy and substandard quality of care were identified. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600May 15, 2026
Based on staff interviews, resident interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents from neglect. The facility failed to ensure licensed nursing services were available on the [NAME] Wing nursing unit from approximately 7:47 p.m. on 1/31/26 until 7:00 a.m. on 2/1/26. During this period, 39 residents were without access to licensed nursing assessment, medication administration, monitoring, physician notification, and nursing intervention. As a result, Resident #6 (R6), Resident #7 (R7), and Resident #8 (R8) experienced untreated pain, delayed or missed medications, anxiety, insomnia, and psychosocial distress. This deficient practice constituted neglect and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF725May 15, 2026
Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident affecting 39 residents on the [NAME] Wing. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse coverage on the west wing, resulting in one of the three nursing units operating without a licensed nurse available to administer medications or provide nursing oversight for approximately 12 hours. This deficient practice resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ), and subsequent substandard care. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF692Apr 17, 2024
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to ensure that 4 residents (Resident #14, Resident #13, Resident #3, and Resident #12), in a survey sample of 48 residents, maintained an acceptable parameter of nutritional status and as a result, all 4 experienced insidious, severe weight loss that was unplanned resulting in immediate jeopardy being identified. The findings included: On 3/19/24 at approximately 12:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician (RD), who was in the dining room. The RD reported that he comes weekly and is at the facility for 8 hours. […]
- Actual harm, patternF697May 15, 2026
Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This deficient practice resulted in harm for three residents, Resident #6 (R6), Resident #7 (R7), and Resident #8 (R8) out of a survey sample of nine residents. […]
Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 194 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 15, 2026Complaint17 findings · 5 harm
- Dec 17, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Jul 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2024Complaint32 findings · 6 harm
- Nov 29, 2023Complaint6 findings
- Feb 2, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
- Aug 4, 2022Complaint8 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Standard7 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Oct 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jun 24, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 23, 2017Standard14 findings
- Mar 9, 2016Standard9 findings
- Mar 19, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
- May 29, 2014Complaint2 findings
- May 2, 2014Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 26, 2014Standard11 findings
- Feb 14, 2013—11 findings
- Jan 20, 2012—11 findings
- Aug 10, 2011—5 findings
- Dec 2, 2010—12 findings · 3 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Mountain Laurel Rehabilitation and NursingRural Retreat8 harm findings
- Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond1 harm finding
- Seven Hills Rehabilitation and NursingLynchburg7 harm findings
- Augusta Nursing and RehabilitationFishersville8 harm findings
- Henrico Health & Rehabilitation CenterHighland Springs12 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction