King Street Home Inc
Port Chester, New York · CCN 335447
13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 60
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Westchester
- Medicare-certified since
- 1975
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.
Last survey on record
Mar 30, 2026
224 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.06 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.79 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.0% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2273.3% | E413.3% | F13.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B310.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at King Street Home Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 30, 2026
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 3/23/26 - 3/30/26, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. Specifically, during a Norovirus (very contagious stomach virus that causes nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) outbreak on 4/11/2025, the facility did not ensure an infection surveillance plan based on facility assessment was implemented for the identification, containment and prevention of infections and did not complete and submit a Nosocomial Outbreak Reporting Application ([NAME]) report as requested by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) on 04/16/2025; and 2) the facility's infection control line… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Apr 18, 2025
Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00354758), the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #3, Resident #8) reviewed for medication. Specifically, (1) during Resident #3's discharge instruction on their medications with Registered Nurse #1 on 9/16/2024, their family representative alerted Registered Nurse #1 that two medications: Lexapro (an antidepressant) and Seroquel/Quetiapine Fumarate(anti-psychotic) were prescribed to the resident in error because the resident was never on those medications. Resident #3 had received the antidepressant (Lexapro 10 mg) from 9/4/2024 to 9/16/2024. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF604Jan 11, 2024
43478 Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey from 1/4/24 to 1/11/24, the facility did not ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 7 of 7 residents (#15, #7, #17, #40, #49, #226, #227) reviewed for physical restraints. Specifically, Residents #15, #7, #17, #40, #49, #226, and #227 were observed with bed or chair alarms and (1) thorough assessments and re-evaluations were not conducted to address the use of alarms, (2) the physician's order was not obtained to address the medical symptoms that may warrant the use of the device, and (3) there was no evidence of consent for the use of the device. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 11, 2024
Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) opened, undated, unlabeled, and/or expired foods were stored in two (2) refrigerated units and one (1) freezer unit; and 2) the concentration of quaternary ammonium compound chemical sanitizing rinse (QAC) was less than required by the manufacturer to ensure sanitization of food preparation and service equipment. The findings are: A facility policy dated ,d+[DATE] and titled Food storage and labeling policy, documented that food is stored at a safe temperature, and for safe lengths of time. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF627Mar 30, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (2564447) surveys conducted 03/23/2026 - 03/30/2026, the facility did not ensure an appropriate discharge plan for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #30) reviewed for discharge. Specifically, Resident #30 was sent to the hospital for a medical condition and provided a discharge notice while hospitalized . The discharge was appealed, and the resident was not accepted back to the facility when medically cleared to return to the facility. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 60 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 30, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 18, 2025Complaint9 findings
- Jan 11, 2024Standard8 findings
- Nov 12, 2020Standard4 findings
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2018Standard6 findings
- May 1, 2017Standard3 findings
- Apr 6, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Feb 12, 2015Standard3 findings
- Feb 19, 2014—7 findings
- Jan 25, 2013—6 findings
- Apr 25, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 7, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Seneca Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLCWaterloono harm findings
- Pathways Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterNiskayuna1 harm finding
- Forest Hills Care CenterForest Hillsno harm findings
- Washington Center for Rehab and HealthcareArgyle2 harm findings
- Beacon Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterFar Rockaway1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction