Beacon Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Far Rockaway, New York · CCN 335726
12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 35
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Queens
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 15, 2026
298 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.86 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 13.2% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,512 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G16.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1280.0% | E— | F213.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Beacon Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 14, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00334677), the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents sampled for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, on 02/28/24 at approximately 7:00 pm, Resident #1 reported to Nursing Supervisor #1 that they were kicked in the scrotal area by Certified Nursing Assistant #2. Resident #1 reported that when they were kicked in the groin, they screamed out in pain. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 also reported to Nursing Supervisor #1 they witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 kick Resident #1 in their private area and that Resident #1 screamed out in pain. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, multiple refrigerated food items were undated and stored in open packaging. Additionally, the kitchen staff were not monitoring the cold food temperatures. The findings are: A facility policy titled Food Storage documented all food stored is maintained in a safe, sanitary, and temperature-controlled manner in order to prevent foodborne illnesses, contamination, and spoilage. All food items shall be stored, labeled, dated, and monitored in accordance with the accepted food safety standards and regulatory requirements. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 4, 2022
Based on observations, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that infection control practices and procedures were maintained. Specifically, 1). oxygen tubing was observed touching the floor on multiple occasions, and 2). the facility-specific water management plan for Legionella was missing the following required components: (a) environmental assessment of water system. (b) Legionella sampling plan in place for the potable water system. This was evident for 2 out 2 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care out of a sample of 24 residents and during review of Infection Control. (Resident # 6 and Resident # 54) The findings are: 1 (a). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jan 15, 2026
Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #70) of two (2) residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, on 01/12/2026 Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was observed in the hallway pulling Resident #70 backwards for approximately 100 feet while the resident was laying completely flat on a shower bed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Jan 15, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for two (2) (Resident #7 and Resident #10) of three (3) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) during the wound care observation for Resident #7, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not cleanse all surfaces of the wound bed, including the part of the wound with undermining (a pocket or shelf beneath the surface of the skin extending beyond the visible opening, making it harder to heal and prone to infection). […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 35 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 15, 2026Standard3 findings
- Mar 14, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 2, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Feb 4, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
- Sep 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2017Standard1 finding
- Sep 21, 2015Standard1 finding
- Sep 17, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jun 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 4, 2012—7 findings
- Sep 26, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Forest Hills Care CenterForest Hillsno harm findings
- King Street Home IncPort Chesterno harm findings
- Washington Center for Rehab and HealthcareArgyle2 harm findings
- Oneida Center for Rehabilitation and NursingUticano harm findings
- Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockawayno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction