Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center
Huntersville, North Carolina · CCN 345570
16 surveys since 2017, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 61
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Mecklenburg
- Medicare-certified since
- 2016
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jun 12, 2026
150 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.91 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 51.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $42,275 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G321.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D857.1% | E214.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B17.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6041×
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 23, 2026
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from staff to resident physical abuse when Nurse Aide #2 hit a severely cognitive impaired resident with an open hand three times during care. Resident #1 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as fear, anxiety, helplessness, and dehumanization from being abused by their caregiver. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1).Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF604Apr 23, 2026
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical restraints when Nurse Aide #2 was witnessed by another staff member (Nurse Aide #1) to hold Resident #1's hands down against her chest to restrict her arm movements during care when the resident became combative. Resident #1 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as panic, distress, anger, and fear from being physically restrained by their caregiver. This deficient practice affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints (Resident #1). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF607Apr 23, 2026
Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure in the areas of protection, prevention and reporting abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). NA # 2 witnessed NA # 1 strike a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) and did not effectively intervene or immediately report to nursing or administration; this resulted in NA # 2 striking the resident two more times. A reasonable person would expect a witness to remove a cognitively impaired, vulnerable resident from an abusive situation and protect them from further abuse. A reasonable person would feel very dehumanized and helpless from repeated physical abuse. Findings included:The facility's abuse policy dated 10/17/23 was reviewed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 10, 2023
Based on observations, record review, resident, staff, and family interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was seated in a safe position on the bed after a transfer which resulted in a fall with femur fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side, vertigo, presence of left artificial knee joint and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed she was cognitively intact with no refusals or rejection of care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 4, 2021
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews the facility neglected to provide incontinence care to a resident who was soiled with dried fecal matter and urine for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The resident stated that her bottom was burning and stinging so badly and all she could think about was sitting in hot water and soaking her rear end. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] A care plan updated on [DATE] read in part, potential for skin impairment related to bowel incontinence. The goal read; resident will have no evidence of skin impairment through the next review. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 61 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 12, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 23, 2026Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- May 7, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
- Oct 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 25, 2024Standard4 findings
- Apr 10, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jun 9, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Oct 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 24, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Aug 4, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 28, 2020Standard3 findings
- May 17, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings · 3 harm
- Jun 7, 2018Standard7 findings
- Apr 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh3 harm findings
- Valley View Care and RehabilitationAndrews4 harm findings
- Life Care Center of HendersonvilleHendersonville1 harm finding
- Hilltop Health and RehabilitationRutherfordton4 harm findings
- King Health and Rehabilitation CenterKing3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction