Deficiency Index

Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center

Huntersville, North Carolina · CCN 345570

16 surveys since 2017, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2017–2026
’17’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFEWORKS REHAB
County
Mecklenburg
Medicare-certified since
2016

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jun 12, 2026

150 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.913.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$42,275 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG321.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD857.1%E214.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B17.1%C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Huntersville Health & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 23, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from staff to resident physical abuse when Nurse Aide #2 hit a severely cognitive impaired resident with an open hand three times during care. Resident #1 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as fear, anxiety, helplessness, and dehumanization from being abused by their caregiver. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1).Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF604Apr 23, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical restraints when Nurse Aide #2 was witnessed by another staff member (Nurse Aide #1) to hold Resident #1's hands down against her chest to restrict her arm movements during care when the resident became combative. Resident #1 did not have the cognitive capacity to express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as panic, distress, anger, and fear from being physically restrained by their caregiver. This deficient practice affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints (Resident #1). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF607Apr 23, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure in the areas of protection, prevention and reporting abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). NA # 2 witnessed NA # 1 strike a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) and did not effectively intervene or immediately report to nursing or administration; this resulted in NA # 2 striking the resident two more times. A reasonable person would expect a witness to remove a cognitively impaired, vulnerable resident from an abusive situation and protect them from further abuse. A reasonable person would feel very dehumanized and helpless from repeated physical abuse. Findings included:The facility's abuse policy dated 10/17/23 was reviewed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 10, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, resident, staff, and family interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was seated in a safe position on the bed after a transfer which resulted in a fall with femur fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side, vertigo, presence of left artificial knee joint and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed she was cognitively intact with no refusals or rejection of care. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 4, 2021

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews the facility neglected to provide incontinence care to a resident who was soiled with dried fecal matter and urine for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The resident stated that her bottom was burning and stinging so badly and all she could think about was sitting in hot water and soaking her rear end. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] A care plan updated on [DATE] read in part, potential for skin impairment related to bowel incontinence. The goal read; resident will have no evidence of skin impairment through the next review. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 12, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Apr 23, 2026Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • May 7, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Oct 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Apr 10, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Oct 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 4, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 28, 2020Standard3 findings
  • May 17, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 7, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction