Deficiency Index

Hunter Acres Caring Center

Sikeston, Missouri · CCN 265387

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
91
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES
County
Scott · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Aug 7, 2025

459 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.423.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.21—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%57.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,023 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2083.3%E28.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.2%
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 91 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hunter Acres Caring Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 7, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #1), who had impaired memory, poor judgement and insight, and was assessed as an elopement risk. On 11/04/23, during a supervised smoke break, the supervising staff person left the resident alone and the resident left the facility grounds. The resident was found in a city approximately 30 miles away. The facility census was 87. The Administration was notified on 11/07/23 of a Past Non-Compliance citation Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 11/4/23. Upon discovery, the facility staff conducted an investigation, implemented facility protocols, and in-serviced staff on protective oversight. The IJ was corrected on 11/04/23. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 87.The facility did not provide a policy on the environment. 1. Observation on 08/04/25 at 10:24 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - The bathroom door with a smeared brown substance; - Dirt and debris on the floor. 2.Observation on 08/04/25 at 10:35 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - A spider web in the window seal. 3. Observation on 08/05/25 at 2:55 P.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - The bathroom flooring peeled and separated from the subfloor; - A black substance on the upper portion of all of the bathroom walls and with a musty smell. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the insect population in the facility. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, dated May 2008, showed:- This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents;- Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services.Review of the facility's Pest Control Invoices for May - August 2025 showed:- May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025 service targeted the German roach and the house mouse;- No services targeted flies.Observations of the 200 Hall dining room showed:- On 08/04/25 at 12:20 P.M., and 08/05/25 at 12:20… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Aug 7, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct code status for one resident (Resident #2) out of 19 sampled residents and failed to address and receive an order for a code status for one resident (Resident #86) outside the sample. The facility census was 87. Review of the facility's policy titled, Advanced Directives, dated [DATE], showed:- Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives;- The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he/she chooses to do so;-… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF605Aug 7, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt and ensure the physician responded to gradual dose reductions (GDRs) for medications for two residents (Residents #4 and #19) and failed to limit the use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication orders for 14 days for one resident (Resident #19) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 87.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR), revised February 2025, showed: - The MRR includes a review of the medical record to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities, for example, the use of medication was inconsistent with accepted pharmaceutical services… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 91 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Aug 8, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 7, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 5, 2023Standard10 findings
  • May 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Oct 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • May 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Jun 15, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jun 3, 2016Standard7 findings
  • May 7, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2014Standard6 findings
  • May 17, 2013—10 findings
  • Mar 9, 2012—11 findings
  • May 27, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction