Deficiency Index

Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Forsyth, Missouri · CCN 265605

21 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
75
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN
County
Taney · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Nov 17, 2025

357 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.903.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.30—
Annual nurse turnover36.5%57.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1456.0%E832.0%F312.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 75 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Forsyth Rehabilitation & Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 17, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice and in a manner to prevent possible contamination when the facility failed to keep dented cans separated from other cans, when the facility staff failed to ensure all food items were properly labeled and sealed, failed to ensure expired foods were discarded, when the facility staff failed to ensure fans in food areas were free from dirt and debris, and when staff stacked dishes while still wet. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 93 residents.1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 11, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed free from possible contamination and in sound condition in accordance with professional standards when staff failed to dispose of food after expiration, ready-to-eat foods were touched with bare hands, a thermometer was not properly cleaned, and frozen meat was not stored properly. The failed practice had the potential to affect 76 census residents consuming food in the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 26, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean manner when staff failed to keep the handsink clean, failed to keep walls in the dishwashing area clean, failed to keep shelves in the walk-in cooler clean, failed to keep an air vent clean, and failed to keep flies to a minimum. The facility census was 83. Record review of Cleaning Schedules, dated April 2011, showed the following: -It is the responsibility of the Dining Services Manager to enforce the cleaning schedules and to monitor the completion of assigned cleaning tasks; -Daily, weekly and monthly cleaning schedules prepared by the Dining Services Manager with all cleaning tasks listed will be posed in the Dietary Department; -It will specify the days the cleaning schedule… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Nov 17, 2025

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed promote each resident's right to self-determination when the facility failed to provide services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene in accordance with resident preferences for five residents (Resident #86, #77, #84, #82, and #64). The facility census was 93.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to showers. 1. Review of Resident #86's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following information:-admission date of 06/12/25;-Diagnoses included diabetes (a chronic condition in which the body cannot regulate blood sugar levels properly), chronic pain, high blood pressure, and chronic osteomyelitis (an autoimmune disease that causes bone… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Nov 17, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed document identification and use of possible alternatives prior to use of side rails; failed to document assessing risk versus benefits of side rail use; failed to obtain informed consent for the use of side rails prior to installation; failed to care plan side rails; and failed to complete ongoing assessments to ensure the side rails are appropriate for use for eight residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #12, Resident #19, Resident #47, Resident #86, Resident #77, and Resident #100). […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 75 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 17, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Dec 16, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2021Standard7 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jan 29, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 10, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Mar 21, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Apr 15, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Sep 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2015Standard8 findings
  • May 2, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Feb 6, 2014—1 finding
  • May 10, 2013—3 findings
  • Jul 11, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2012—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 7, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction