Deficiency Index

Aspire Senior Living Carthage

Carthage, Missouri · CCN 265320

24 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
83
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
County
Jasper
Medicare-certified since
1987
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.643.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.23—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1565.2%E521.7%F313.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 83 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6912×

    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living Carthage, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 31, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice and in a manner to prevent possible contamination when the facility staff failed to air dry dishes before stacking; failed to wear hair restraints appropriately; failed to maintain a proper air gap to prevent possible back flow; failed to maintain the ice machine and scoop; and failed to maintain food contact surfaces and nonfood contact surfaces, including the stove/oven, in a manner that would prevent possible contamination of food. These concerns had the potential of affecting any of the residents. The facility census was 111. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Mar 31, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide a sanitary environment in the kitchen when staff failed to ensure all areas in the kitchen were kept clean. This could have the potential to affect all of the residents. The facility had a census of 111. Review of the 2022 Food Code, issued by the FDA, showed the following information: -The objective of cleaning focuses on the need to remove organic matter from food contact surfaces so that sanitization can occur and to remove soil from nonfood contact surfaces so that pathogenic microorganisms will not be allowed to accumulate and insects and rodents will not be attracted; -The presence of food debris or dirt on nonfood contact surfaces may provide a suitable environment for the growth of microorganisms which… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 26, 2023

    Based on observations,interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as required for 115 census residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. These failures had the potential to lead to food-borne illness among all facility residents. Review of the Dietary Service Manual, dated 08/10/18, showed the following: -Kitchens and dining areas should be kept clean, free from litter, and rubbish, and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects; -Utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment should be kept clean, maintained in good repair, and should be free from breaks, corrosion, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas; - Items in storage… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jul 17, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to ensure wound care was completed and documented for three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) with skin abrasions, including pressure ulcer, surgical wounds, blisters, skin tears, and venous wounds; failed to ensure topical treatment was completed for two residents (Resident #5 and #6) with rashes. The facility census was 115. Review of the facility policy, dated 10/01/25, titled Wound Treatment Management, showed the following: -To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; -Wound treatments will be provided in… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Dec 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care per standards of practice when staff failed to consistently assess and document complete, thorough weekly skin assessments and failed care plan related to skin for three residents (Resident #3, Resident #2, and Resident #4) and when staff applied treatment to skin conditions without physician's orders for two residents (Resident #3 and #4). A sample of six residents were reviewed in a facility with a census of 111. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 83 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 17, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 31, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Oct 26, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Oct 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Aug 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Dec 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Feb 14, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Aug 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2017Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 9, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Dec 26, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 13, 2013—4 findings
  • Jul 29, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 15, 2013Standard and complaint8 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 23, 2012—2 findings
  • May 12, 2011—6 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction