Deficiency Index

Heather Hill Healthcare Center

New Port Richey, Florida · CCN 105343

24 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
96
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
105
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT
County
Pasco
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 43 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

May 20, 2026

173 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.443.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.57—
Annual nurse turnover38.2%37.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1872.0%E624.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 96 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Heather Hill Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 20, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and supervision for the safety of one resident (#1) out of three sampled residents. Resident #1 suffered a fall with major injury requiring transfer to a higher level of care for treatment. Findings included: Review of the report titled incidents by incident type for 1/1/2026 to 5/20/2026 showed Resident #1 as having an unwitnessed fall on 1/11/2026, 2/10/2026, 3/9/2026, and 4/12/2026. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed:4/12/2026 at 11:40 p.m. Resident returned back to facility from the hospital with a comminuted left humeral head fracture with surgical neck involvement and displacement of the greater tuberosity (meaning: a severe, multi-part break near the shoulder joint. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645Jun 6, 2024

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II upon having a qualifying mental health diagnosis for 7 of 20 residents sampled (Residents #80, #54, #19, #62, #22, #52, and #33). Findings included: 1. Review of the Admission Record showed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, psychosis, anxiety, pseudobulbar affect, and other comorbidities. Review of Resident #54's PASRR Level I Assessment, dated 4/30/2021 did not reveal a qualifying mental health diagnosis marked in section I A. Section 6 was marked yes for dementia with a suspected mental illness although a level II PASRR was not completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jun 6, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure care was provided in accordance with professional standards by failing to ensure Hospice care coordination was in place for 2 (#12 and #52) of 4 residents with a Hospice diagnosis and did not ensure one resident ( #5) out of 5 residents received appropriate care and services related to behaviors. Findings included: 1. On 06/03/24 at 01:32 p.m., Resident #12 was observed in bed sleeping. The resident did not respond to the interview. An immediate interview was conducted with the Responsible Party who was visiting. She stated the resident was on Hospice. She stated the resident had declined significantly and she occasionally expressed pain. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jun 6, 2024

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of 30 residents on one (400 - secure) of four units during mealtime and for 30 residents on one (400 - secure) of four units for activities over three (06/03/2024, 06/04/2024 and 06/06/2024) out of four days observed. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/3/24 at 10:50 a.m. of Resident #17 sitting in the dining room on the 400 unit. No staff were interacting with the resident, she had nothing at the table to do, and there were no activities going on. The resident remained in the same spot at 1:48 p.m. No staff interacted with the resident or provided any stimulation. No activities were observed throughout the day on 6/3/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Jun 6, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who entered arbitration agreements understood the contract contents for three residents (#342, #22 and #87) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview conducted on 06/05/24 at 03:03 p.m., Resident #342 stated she had signed the arbitration agreement during orientation. She stated a young man came to the room the other day with a stack of papers and had her sign all kinds of paperwork. She said, To be honest I don't know what that is. Everything was mumbo jumbo (meaning confusing or meaningless). I told my husband to listen to him. The resident and surveyor reviewed the Arbitration Agreement with her signature dated 06/03/24. She said, Yes that is my signature. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 96 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Jan 23, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2022Standard14 findings
  • Jan 15, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Sep 23, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • May 10, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Oct 17, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 15, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 31, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013—4 findings
  • Apr 10, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 9, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2012—4 findings
  • Aug 24, 2011—2 findings
  • Apr 29, 2011—11 findings
  • Mar 9, 2011—2 findings
  • Oct 27, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction