Deficiency Index

Hayward Hills Health Care Center

Hayward, California · CCN 056447

28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MARINER HEALTH CARE
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.214.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.64—
Annual nurse turnover56.1%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1747.2%E1644.4%F25.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6882×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hayward Hills Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to safely transfer one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when a staff transferred Resident 1 from bed to a shower chair using a Hoyer lift (mechanical device that lifts a resident for transfer, the resident will be suspended in the air in a sling while being move from a bed to a chair) without assistance from another staff member. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling and sustaining multiple injuries: Multiple rib fractures (broken ribs), Trace Right-Sided Pneumothorax (presence of air in the space between the lung and chest wall leading to breathing difficulty and chest pain), Left Femur Peri-Prosthetic Fracture (broken bone around the artificial joint of the left thigh); and caused… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF756Aug 16, 2024

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) provided the Medical Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations and Executive Summary to the facility within the timeframes established in the facility's policies and procedures for four out of four months and the facility did not act on the reports within 30 days for five of 10 sampled residents (Residents 56, 26, 2, 66, and 54). This failure had the potential to result in Residents not receiving therapeutic recommendation on drug therapies. Findings: During a telephone interview on 8/15/24 at 9:19 a.m., with PC and Regional Supervisor (RS), PC stated that PC visits the facility once a month and completes the MRR for the month and submits the report within 48 hours. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Aug 16, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clean dishes in a safe and sanitary method when the dishwasher did not reach the required temperature. This failure had the potential to result in 65 residents being served food on dishes that were not sanitized, which could lead to the spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 8/13/24 at 10:41 a.m. in the kitchen, the highest temperature reached by the dishwasher was 110 degrees ( ) Fahrenheit (F, a unit to measure temperature). During a second observation on 8/13/24 at 10:44 a.m., the highest temperature reached by the dishwasher was 110 F. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/24 at 11:11 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jun 11, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 7) when nursing staff did not follow the physician's order for Resident 7's oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential to cause health complications to Resident 7. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's face sheet, undated, indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/20/26, indicated Resident 7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 2 out of 15. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jun 11, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 27 and 80) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when:1. Direct Care Staff did not follow physician's orders to assess Resident 27 for bleeding and did not follow up with Resident 27's physician regarding her orders to hold or to restart Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication used to prevent and treat blood clots, and lower stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) for a period of over six months. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Aug 16, 2024Standard8 findings
  • Jul 18, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 6, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2022Standard11 findings
  • Mar 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Dec 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 7, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Oct 18, 2017Standard5 findings
  • May 2, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 26, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Oct 2, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jun 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 7, 2014Standard3 findings
  • May 31, 2013—8 findings
  • Aug 16, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2012—8 findings
  • Jan 24, 2011—16 findings
  • Dec 7, 2010—1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction