Deficiency Index

Elmwood Care Center

Berkeley, California · CCN 555819

47 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
130
Surveys
47
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file36/47

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
PRATAP PODDATOORI
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 25, 2026

137 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.294.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.05—
Annual nurse turnover58.3%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2561.0%E922.0%F24.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B49.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 130 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8806×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F9123×

    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Elmwood Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1, with a history of repeated falls, sustained another fall while ambulating (walking) on his own in the facility's hallway.This failure resulted in Resident 1's falling on the ground, sustaining a fracture (broken bone) to the right hip, and transferring to the acute care hospital for right hip surgery.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a record with basic information) printed on 11/3/25, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on the facility on 04/07/25.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 18, 2024

    45091 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in clean environment, within standards for safety when: 1. Floor drains were not maintained clean; 2. Kitchen tile floors were not clean and were not maintained in good repair; 3. Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS; a food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit pathogenic microorganism growth or toxin formation) was not cooled safely and there was no cooldown documentation; 4. Meat was not thawed appropriately; 5. The inside of a food storage refrigerator was not clean; 6. An industrial can opener was not maintained and clean; 7. Clean plates were handled with dirty oven mitts; 8. A food service equipment drawer was not clean; 9. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF813Jul 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents had a location to safely store perishable food brought into the facility by family/visitors; and 2. A policy described the safe storage of food brought in by family members. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness from unsafe food storage, decreased food intake, and did not create a homelike environment for 65 residents who took food by mouth out of a census of 68. Findings: During an interview on 7/16/24 at 2:40 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated sometimes food brought in by family/visitors was stored for residents in the staff refrigerator. CNA 1 stated she thought perishable food could be stored up to 24 hours in the staff refrigerator. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 18, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during COVID-19 (a contagious virus that mainly affects the lungs and can range from) outbreak when:1. Multiple resident rooms housing COVID-19 positive residents were left with doors open.2. Resident 2 and Resident 3, who were COVID-19 positive, were observed outside of their isolation rooms.3. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 who assisted Resident 3 inside the room did not have personal protective equipment (PPE, proper specialized clothing or equipment worn to protect against workplace hazards or diseases).These failures had the potential to expose staff, visitors, and other residents to COVID-19, increasing the risk of transmission and compromising the health and safety of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jun 6, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the needs of five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) when the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ' s use of handheld call bells when the call light system was not operational. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 not receiving appropriate care and monitoring. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 5/9/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses of weakness and history of falling. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 130 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 39 earlier surveys
  • Jul 18, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Jun 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 28, 2022Standard13 findings
  • May 24, 2022Infection control2 findings
  • Apr 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Dec 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Sep 28, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Dec 1, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 22, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Jul 9, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 30, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 26, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 2, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2012—1 finding
  • May 31, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2012—15 findings
  • Feb 7, 2011—3 findings
  • Dec 28, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction