Deficiency Index

Grace Heights Health & Rehabilitation

Morganton, North Carolina · CCN 345187

11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
29
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION
County
Burke
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 11, 2024

789 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 29 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Grace Heights Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 11, 2024

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date leftover food items stored for use and failed to keep a food storage area clean. These practices occurred in the walk-in refrigerator and had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen occurred on 9/8/24 at 9:28 AM. The following concerns were identified: a. Items in the walk-in refrigerator that were opened and labeled, but past the use by date included: - a resealable bag of seven prepared biscuits labeled with a use by date of 9/6/24. - a resealable bag of five hamburger patties with a use by date of 9/5/24. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641May 25, 2022

    Based on record reviews, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to reflect the diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #55) and urinary continence for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary appliance (Resident #61 and Resident #66). Findings included: 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] Review of Resident #67's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was not coded as having a dementia diagnosis. Review of Resident #67 revised care plan dated 04/18/22 revealed no care plan specific to dementia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 25, 2022

    Based on record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered plan of care to address specific needs of the residents in the areas of activities of daily living for 2 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #57 and Resident #66) and dementia care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #67). The findings included: 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #57 was severely impaired for cognitive skills for daily decision making and had fluctuating altered level of consciousness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 25, 2022

    Based on record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended practices for COVID-19 when 2 of 2 staff members (Nurse #2) failed to wear an N95 mask prior to entering a room of a COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #252) and (Nurse Aide #1) failed to remove her N95 mask, disinfect her goggles and perform hand hygiene after leaving a room of a COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #251). In addition, 2 of 3 staff members (Nurse #3 and Nurse #1) failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care on 2 of 3 residents (Resident #57 and Resident #61) reviewed. These failures occurred during a COVID-19 pandemic. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF888May 25, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to implement an effective process for tracking COVID-19 vaccination status of 5 of 5 facility staff (Nurse Aide (NA) #3, NA #7, NA #8, NA #9, and NA #10) reviewed for COVID-19 Vaccination Status. The facility was currently in outbreak status and failed to have 100% of staff vaccinated. The findings included: The facility's COVID-19 Vaccine policy with no reviewed or revised date, read in part: It is the policy that all persons be offered the COVID-19 vaccine. This includes residents and staff. Staff includes all fulltime, part-time and prn employees, contract staff such as therapy, staffing agency, management company and consultants. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 11, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • May 25, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Oct 4, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jan 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Apr 18, 2013—3 findings
  • Mar 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 27, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction