Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab Center
Glen Rose, Texas · CCN 675572
24 surveys since 2010, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 67
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Somervell · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jan 15, 2026
298 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.39 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.27 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.8% | 48.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $17,128 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G210.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D630.0% | E840.0% | F15.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C315.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5771×
Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 11, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the residents free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2 from being slapped by her spouse which led to redness to the cheek. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse to Resident #1 by a hospitality aide (HA). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began 3/2/25 and ended on 4/24/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place the residents at risk of physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 5, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #1) The facility did not ensure Resident #1 had the chair/bed alarm in place while resident #1 was sitting in the reclining chair. The resident fell and fractured her nose. This failure could place the only resident using a bed/chair alarm as an assistive device at risk for accidents or falls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 10, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure: 1. All opened items in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry food storage were dated and labeled and free from expired foods. 2. The ice machine was cleaned properly. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings included: During observation on [DATE] at 10:15 AM the facility kitchen revealed: Refrigerator #1 of 2 1 container of sliced pickles, outside the original container and covered with plastic wrap, unlabeled, or dated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 10, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed and/or labeled properly in refrigerators and dry storage. The facility failed to ensure all food was not past expiration date. The facility failed to ensure food temperatures were taken correctly and food temperatures were held at or above 140 degrees. The facility failed to ensure that staff utilized proper personal hygiene practices. The facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff did not modify face coverings and ensured the mask covered both mouth and nose. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 20, 2021
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 62 of 63 residents who eat from 1 of 1 kitchen's reviewed. 1.Foods were not sealed and/or labeled properly in dry food storage, refrigerators. These failures could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk for contamination and/or food borne illnesses. Findings included: In an observation on 05/18/2021 at 8:52 AM of the 1 kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed: Refrigerator #1 1. One pitcher of light-colored liquid not labeled or dated 2. One pitcher of light brown colored liquid labeled tea and not dated 3. One pitcher of orange colored liquid not labeled or dated. 4. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 67 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 15, 2026Standard6 findings
- Nov 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 10, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jan 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 13, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jun 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Aug 10, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jan 10, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 20, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
- Aug 5, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Jun 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2019Standard and complaint1 finding
- May 4, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
- May 18, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Apr 8, 2016Standard2 findings
- Nov 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 1, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 19, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Mar 21, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings · 5 harm
- May 18, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 15, 2011—2 findings
- Nov 4, 2010—7 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Hallettsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville2 harm findings
- La Hacienda De Paz Rehabilitation and Care CenterEagle Pass1 harm finding
- Tuskegee Airmen Texas State Veterans HomeFort Worth3 harm findings
- College Park Rehabilitation and Care CenterWeatherford2 harm findings
- Sterling Oaks RehabilitationKatyno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction