La Hacienda De Paz Rehabilitation and Care Center
Eagle Pass, Texas · CCN 676419
10 surveys since 2018. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 104
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE
- County
- Maverick
- Medicare-certified since
- 2017
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Dec 10, 2025
334 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.12 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 95.1% | 48.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,069 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1770.8% | E416.7% | F28.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at La Hacienda De Paz Rehabilitation and Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600May 15, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to supervise and protect Resident #2, who did not have the ability to consent, from harm when Resident #1, on 3/27/25, was observed leaning over Resident #2's bed with his hand under her brief touching her genital area. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past noncompliance. The noncompliance began on 03/27/25 and ended on 03/29/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. A PNC IJ template was presented to the Director of Nursing at 5:45 pm on 05/15/25. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF712Dec 10, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #10, #11, #12, #91) and at least once every 60 days thereafter for 10 of 22 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #7,#9, #13, #20, #29, #67, #94) reviewed for physician services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was seen by the physician every month for the first three months since admission on [DATE].2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was seen by the physician every month for the first three months since admission on [DATE].3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 was seen by the physician every month for the first three months since admission on [DATE].4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 12, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. The facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the ice maker found within the kitchen 2. The facility failed to label and date food containers found within the kitchen. 3. The facility failed to complete daily temperature logs of reach-in refrigerators and freezers found within the kitchen and nourishment room. 4. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer and nourishment room freezer maintained a temperature below 0 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illnesses. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Dec 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 5of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #20, Resident #32, Resident #100, and Resident #10) who were reviewed for resident assessments. 1. The facility failed to accurately documents Resident #1's skin conditions on his significant change MDS. 2.The facility failed to document Resident #20's use of pain medication and antiplatelet medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 3. The facility failed to document Resident #32's use of antidepressant medication and antiplatelet medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 4. The facility failed to document Resident #100's use of antidepressant medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 5. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Jul 12, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living were provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one (Resident #53) of six residents reviewed for ADL care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was provided bathing as scheduled. This failure could place residents who require assistance from staff for personal hygiene at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs and not reaching their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 10, 2025Standard12 findings
- May 15, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 23, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jul 12, 2023Standard6 findings
- Jun 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2022Standard1 finding
- Apr 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 6, 2020Standard5 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Apr 12, 2019Standard9 findings
- Apr 26, 2018Standard4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Coryell Health Rehabliving at the MeadowsGatesvilleno harm findings
- Legacy Nursing and RehabilitationCameronno harm findings
- Hallettsville Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHallettsville2 harm findings
- Tuskegee Airmen Texas State Veterans HomeFort Worth3 harm findings
- Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab CenterGlen Rose2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction