Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation
Katy, Texas · CCN 676417
23 surveys since 2017, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 91
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 126
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2017
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
May 28, 2026
165 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.11 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.1% | 48.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1161.1% | E738.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7554×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F5832×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF656Aug 6, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, mental, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs which were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #71 and #79) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71 had an individualized care plan for to address a gastrostomy feeding tube. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 28, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed on 5.26.26 to seal and cover food stored in refrigerator and out in open area of kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.The findings included: The following observations were made on 5.26.26 beginning at 8:15 AM during initial tour of the kitchen: Observation of the following stored on counter in kitchen:Large baking dish with marble cake sitting out.Large plastic container of coffee grounds with no lid. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Apr 15, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 6 (unknown resident) residents. The facility failed to ensure the privacy of the unknown residents by locking the laptop screen, so the residents' information could not be seen by someone walking by. This failure put residents at risk for confidential health information exposure, psychosocial harm, and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Observation on 4-14-2026 at 9:20 AM - During initial rounds of the facility, it was by the observed in the common area that the laptop on the crash cart was open, with Matrix electronic health care records platform displaying several residents' information on the screen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Nov 19, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #1's September 2025 MARs did not reflect documentation that heart rate and blood pressure was done. Resident #2's September 2025 nurse's notes did not document reasons why blood pressure medication was given when it was supposed to be held. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Sep 29, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 Residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for medical records accuracy, in that: Resident #1's September 2025 MARs did not reflect documentation that heart rate and blood pressure was done. Resident #2's September 2025 nurse's notes did not document reasons why blood pressure medication was given when it was supposed to be held. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility, by placing them at risk for errors in care, and treatment. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 91 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 28, 2026Standard6 findings
- Apr 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Sep 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 27, 2025Standard4 findings
- May 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2024Standard2 findings
- Oct 13, 2022Standard7 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jan 19, 2022Infection control2 findings
- Aug 6, 2021Standard8 findings
- Jul 21, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2020Standard5 findings
- Dec 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 18, 2019Complaint10 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 5, 2019Standard and complaint11 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 16, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Aug 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 2, 2018Standard14 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jan 4, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Tuskegee Airmen Texas State Veterans HomeFort Worth3 harm findings
- Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab CenterGlen Rose2 harm findings
- College Park Rehabilitation and Care CenterWeatherford2 harm findings
- Prairie House Living CenterPlainviewno harm findings
- Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdinburg1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction