Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
Florham Park, New Jersey · CCN 315530
3 surveys since 2024, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 3
- Surveys
- 3
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Across 3 surveys carrying at least one finding.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 53
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Morris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2024
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 12, 2026
242 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.73 | 4.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF755Mar 12, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure that a.) medication was properly administered per manufacturer's specification for (1) of five (5) residents observed during medication administration (Resident#76), b). to document a resident's blood pressure for a medication with perimeters for one (1) of fourteen (14) residents reviewed for medication review (Resident #23) and c. to differentiate pain levels (pain scale) for the use of pain medication for one of one resident reviewed for pain management (Resident #73). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Feb 12, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two dietary aides and one Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performed appropriate hand hygiene. This failure to perform adequate hand hygiene can lead to cross contamination. Findings include: Observation and interview on 02/12/25 at 11:50 AM, revealed CNA1 entered the Bistro (a kitchenette where all meals are brought from the kitchen, placed in the steaming tables, and prepped for meals) where two Dietary Aides (DAs) were preparing lunch trays. CNA1 proceeded to open the ice machine, retrieve the blue ice scooper, and scoop ice from the machine. CNA1 placed ice into her personal water vessel. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Nov 27, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 2 of 12 residents, Resident #6 and #26 reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 11/24/24 at 11:04 AM the surveyor interviewed Resident #6 in their room. Resident #6 stated they occasionally feel anxious but receive medication when needed. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 12, 2026Standard1 finding
- Feb 12, 2025Infection control1 finding
- Nov 27, 2024Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction