Sunnyside Manor
Wall, New Jersey · CCN 315354
13 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Monmouth
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 12, 2025
423 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.12 | 4.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.53 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 20.0% | 37.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E116.7% | F116.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sunnyside Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a clean and sanitary manner prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development of foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/09/2025 at 8:33 AM, the surveyor conducted a tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: The large ice machine was observed with with visibly blackened areas on the exterior of the baffle (the component that directs the flow of ice into the storage bin). The FSD removed the baffle which exposed various blackened mold like in appearance areas inside of the ice machine. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Sep 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) a timely nutritional assessment was completed after admission, b) identified nutrition interventions were implemented, and c) nutritional interventions were revised for a resident who experienced a significant weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #4) and who was identified as being at nutritional risk, and at risk for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following:On 09/09/2025 at 12:44 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 in the living room on the main floor and was sitting in a wheeled recliner. Resident #4 was watching television with other residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to accepted standards of infection control practices for the proper storage of respiratory tubing and mask after use for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident # 35). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/09/25 at 10:21 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #35 seated in a recliner chair in the room. Resident #35 had a Nebulizer machine and a Nebulizer mask (used for breathing treatments) with white stains and was directly placed on top of the nightstand. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640May 16, 2024
Based on interviews and review of medical records it was determined that the facility failed to complete and electronically transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), within 14 days of the resident's discharge. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident # 27) reviewed in the Resident Assessment Task for MDS record over 120 days old. On 05/08/2024 the surveyor reviewed the MDS history in the electronic medical record which revealed: Resident #27 was discharged on [DATE]. The surveyor was unable to locate a discharge MDS in Resident #27's electronic medical record. On 05/09/2024, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), who stated that the discharge MDS on Resident #27 should've been completed within 14 days of discharge date . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF697May 16, 2024
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to treat a resident's pain to the extent possible in accordance to current professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 38) investigated for Pain. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 38's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 05/08/2024 revealed under section J. that he/she received as needed and scheduled medications for pain. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 12, 2025Standard3 findings
- May 16, 2024Standard2 findings
- Aug 10, 2022Standard1 finding
- Feb 20, 2020Standard1 finding
- Dec 21, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jan 17, 2018Standard3 findings
- Feb 27, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Complaint3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jan 11, 2016Standard2 findings
- Dec 12, 2014Standard4 findings
- Feb 18, 2014Standard3 findings
- Mar 27, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction