Deficiency Index

Excelcare at Lewes LLC

Lewes, Delaware · CCN 085034

29 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
252
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
179
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EXCELCARE
County
Sussex · rural
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 32 for-profit facilities in Delaware.

Last survey on record

Feb 18, 2026

264 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.893.90
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover45.7%41.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$99,938 across 2 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4291.3%E12.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.2%
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 252 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Excelcare at Lewes LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 18, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R173) out of two residents reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to ensure that R173 maintained proper hydration which resulted in harm, requiring hospitalization on 6/1/25 and 6/19/25 with diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) and dehydration. Findings include:The BUN (blood urea nitrogen) lab test measures the amount of urea nitrogen in the blood. The BUN is directly related to the metabolic function of the liver and the excretory function of the kidney . BUN levels also may vary according to the state of hydration, with increased levels seen in dehydration and decreased levels seen in overhydration. Mosby's Diagnostic and Laboratory Test Reference 2023. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 14, 2025

    Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R2) out of seven residents reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. R2 was found on the floor of his room, with R1 standing over him, and sent to ER for a head injury. This failure resulted in physical harm (R2) and psychosocial harm as the reasonable person would be adversely affected by being attacked in their home. Findings include:Cross refer F609 and F740.Review of R1's and R2's record revealed:7/1/25 - R2 was admitted to the facility.7/28/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility.8/12/25 - A care plan was initiated for R1 documenting socially inappropriate behavior as evidenced by verbal aggression toward staff and other residents. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Feb 1, 2023

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management according to professional standards of practice for one (R97) out of three residents sampled for pain. R97 was not provided pain medication causing unrelieved pain for approximately six hours resulting in harm. Findings include: November 2009 - The American Academy of Pain Medicine, Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older persons, stated to refer to the previous American Geriatrics Society for specific recommendations for pain assessment in older persons that remain relevant. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 10, 2022

    Based on review of the food temperature logs and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently monitor food temperatures prior to food service. Findings include: 10/10/22 9:35 AM - A review of facility food temperature logs between between April 1, 2022 and September 30, 2022 revealed that 75 out of 549 (13.7%) meals served lacked evidence that food temperatures were monitored. 10/10/22 10:10 AM - During an interview, E3 (FSD) confirmed that temperatures were not taken at every meal. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) during the exit conference on 10/10/22, beginning at approximately 2:15 PM.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Mar 20, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for five (R41, R309, R14, R65, R5 and R90) out of eight residents reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed to ensure that a referral for a PASARR screening was completed. Findings include: 1. Review of R41's clinical record revealed: 12/6/23 - R41 had a PASARR I completed at the hospital with the indication of no level II needed and no suspected or confirmed PASARR conditions. 12/19/23 - R41 had a PASARR completed at a different facility with indication of level I negative and no suspected or confirmed PASARR conditions. 12/22/23 - R41 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of persistent mood affective disorder, unspecified. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 252 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 18, 2026Standard and complaint21 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 14, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 13, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Mar 20, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Feb 1, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Feb 18, 2020Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 4, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Apr 4, 2018Standard and complaint23 findings
  • Oct 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Jul 1, 2016Standard8 findings
  • May 6, 2016Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 5, 2015Standard13 findings
  • May 2, 2014Standard17 findings
  • Apr 25, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 8, 2014Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 9, 2013Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2013—5 findings
  • Jun 26, 2013—19 findings
  • Apr 25, 2012—20 findings
  • Dec 7, 2011—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 6, 2011—2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2011—12 findings
  • Dec 1, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction