Cadia Rehabilitation Renaissance

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cadia Rehabilitation Renaissance, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Jun 26, 2024

  Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for two (R1 and R2) out of two residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the protection of all residents from alleged sexual abuse. The facility's failure placed all residents at risk for a serious adverse outcome, by not immediately protecting the resident and allowing the CNA to continue providing care for other residents. An IJ was identified on 6/17/24 and due to the facility's corrective measures this is being cited as past non-compliance with a compliance date 6/14/24. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 25, 2025

  Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dishes and utensils were cleaned under sanitary conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of food storage areas and properly store items in facility unit refrigerators. Findings include: 1. 8/19/25 9:36 AM - 9:41 AM - During a follow up visit to the kitchen, the dish washer was observed as having a water temperature of 135 degrees during the wash cycle. The digital screen that displayed the dish cycle temperatures, flashed red and [alarmed] kitchen staff that the temperature was below 150 degrees. 8/19/25 9:43 AM - During an interview, E15 (FSD) confirmed the wash cycle for the temperature did not meet the minimum 150 degrees. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 25, 2025

  Based on interview, and record review it was determined that for two (R118 and R120) out of nine residents sampled for discharge and hospitalization the facility failed to send the required notification to the Ombudsman of transfer discharge. Findings include:1. A review of R118's clinical record revealed: 6/16/25 - R118 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including complete obstruction of the intestines and acute kidney failure. 7/22/25 10:55 AM - Review of R118's progress note documented R118 was admitted to the hospital. 8/22/25 12:20 PM - During an interview E17 (SW) reported the Ombudsman was notified quarterly of resident discharges and transfers. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 19, 2024

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's resident rights, the facility failed to ensure 1. residents were provided a homelike environment during meals for eight of eight residents (Resident (R) 46, R8, R25, R32, R36, R83, R111, R32, and R168) during dining; 2. privacy bags covered urinary catheter bags for R51; 3. and privacy with shower schedules was maintained. This failure placed the residents at risk of an undignified dining experience. Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Rights, dated 06/01/24 revealed To promote the interest and well-being of the residents in long-term care facilities, all facilities must treat residents in accordance with the following resident rights: (1) Each resident shall have the right to receive considerate,… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Sep 19, 2024

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility arbitration agreement, the facility failed to thoroughly explain the binding arbitration agreement to residents or their representative and provide an arbitration agreement that granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing it and communicate with federal, state, local officials and the ombudsman for three (Residents (R)11, R43, and R89) of three residents reviewed for arbitration in a sample of 34. This failure denied residents the opportunity to fully understand what the agreement meant and the ability to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing. […]