Deficiency Index

Evansville Care Center

Evansville, Minnesota · CCN 245510

12 surveys since 2012, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
27
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Douglas · rural
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 21, 2026

292 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.923.62
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.29—
Annual nurse turnover16.0%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E—F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 53 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8671×

    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Evansville Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Jan 21, 2026

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/Quality Assurance Process improvement (QAPI) committee was effective in implementing appropriate action plans to correct quality deficiencies identified in previous surveys related to careplans which resulted in deficiencies identified during this survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 24 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:During an interview on 1/21/2026 at 5:12 p.m., administrator confirmed last survey's plan of correction (POC) and indicated the POC had been discussed at QAPI but was not a current QAPI project. Administrator stated after a recertification survey is completed, the results and POC are reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886May 4, 2022

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine COVID-19 testing occurred for unvaccinated staff according to the community positivity rates identified in CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) guidelines. In addition, the facility failed to identify if any individuals providing services under arrangement or volunteers who were not up to date with COVID vaccinations were also routinely tested per CMS guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 24 residents residing in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jan 21, 2026

    Based on interview, document review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed, and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 2 of 12 (R21, R20) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan. R20 R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses which included heart failure, arthritis, and seizure disorder. Indicated R20 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs). R20s quarterly care area assessment (CAA) dated [DATE], had cognitive lose/dementia, behavioral issues, and issues with psychosocial wellbeing. R20's care plan dated [DATE], indicated resident had the potential for social emotional disturbances related to a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Nov 20, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) form-10123 was provided 48 hours prior to discharge for 2 of 3 residents (R22 and R78), and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) form-10055 was provided timely to 1 of 3 residents (R17) reviewed for liability notices and resident rights. Findings include: Review of R22's Physical Therapy (PT) discharge summary and Occupational Therapy (OT) discharge summary dated 5/21/24, indicated R22 no longer required PT and OT services. R22's NOMNC indicated R22's last covered day for Medicare Part A was 5/29/24, and the form-10123 was signed 5/28/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Nov 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding to reflect resident status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 1 residents (R17) reviewed for assessments. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 10/23, identified Section J: Health Conditions was to be completed with the intent to document health conditions, such as falls, that impact a resident's functional status and quality of life. The manual indicated Previous falls, especially recurrent falls and falls with injury, are the most important predictor of future falls and injurious falls. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 21, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2023Standard3 findings
  • May 4, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Jan 27, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jan 11, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Oct 5, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2016Standard4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Dec 19, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2013—5 findings
  • Dec 13, 2012—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 6, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction