The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center
Plainview, Minnesota · CCN 245345
13 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 60
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 42
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Wabasha
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 4, 2025
340 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.29 | 3.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.07 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.9% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D990.0% | E110.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 31, 2026
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer using a mechanical lift was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. R1 was resistive to care and did not want to get up from the bed, however, two staff members proceeded to place a hoyer sling underneath her and began to transfer her from the bed to a shower chair despite R1 being resistive. R1 became more physically behavioral while in the device (i.e., wiggling around, moving) which caused her shoulder to nudge free from the sling mid-air and resulted in an avoidable fall from the lift. R1 sustained a scalp hematoma (i.e., goose egg) with bleeding, bruising on her left side, increased pain, and mental anguish (i.e., tearfulness) from the event which constituted actual harm. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF809Oct 31, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer and/or provide a suitable and nourishing snack after dinner and before bedtime when there were more than 14 hours between the evening and morning meals. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who would require a snack. Findings include: The facility provided a survey preparation binder which included an undated flyer titled Mealtimes: Breakfast - 8:00 a.m. Lunch - 12:00 p.m. Dinner - 5:00 p.m. During an observation on 10/29/24 at 2:08 p.m., a wicker basket was on the counter in the resident dining room. The basket contained applesauce, granola bars, pudding, animal crackers and rice krispie bars. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 31, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed by 3 of 12 staff (NA-A, RN-A, and NA-B) observed prior to providing cares for 6 residents (R14, R4, R30, R37, R36 and R26). The facility was having a gastro-intestinal illness outbreak at the time. Findings: On 3/28/22, 1:45 p.m. two carts with personal protective equipment (PPE) were observed on the 200 hallway with signage posted on the doors to R22's and R10's room and R32's room, indicating persons entering the room should use, contact precautions (use PPE of gown, gloves and mask). Shortly after this, an additional cart with supplies was brought to a nearby room and a sign posted on R238's door also indicating staff were to use, contact precautions. On 3/28/22, 2:33 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF744Aug 31, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and, if needed, develop or implement interventions to reduce distress and behaviors on bath days for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. R1 displayed signs of dementia with obvious cognitive impairment and was identified by the staff to have increased behaviors on her bath/shower days but the medical record lacked evidence this had been evaluated by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to determine if additional interventions were needed.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and no symptoms of delirium. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF565Dec 4, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents call lights were answered in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents (R6, R7) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: R7During an interview on 12/1/25 at 1:04 p.m., R7 stated she sometimes waits 45 minutes before staff respond to her call light. R7 reported I'm not supposed to be walking but sometimes I have to otherwise I have accidents. R7 also reported she has to search for staff when her urinary catheter bag is full. R7's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/25 indicated R7 had mild cognitive impairment.R7's grievance form indicated on 10/2/25, the administrator answered R7's call light. R7 reported to the administrator her call light had been on for a long time. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 60 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 31, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Standard7 findings
- Oct 31, 2024Standard3 findings
- Mar 31, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jan 30, 2020Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2018Standard3 findings
- Feb 16, 2017Standard3 findings
- Dec 10, 2015Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Feb 27, 2015Standard11 findings
- Sep 5, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 19, 2013—5 findings
- Dec 6, 2012—5 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction