Egle Nursing Home
Lonaconing, Maryland · CCN 215307
17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 66
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Allegany · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 31 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Maryland.
Last survey on record
Oct 9, 2025
396 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.25 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.56 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.9% | 44.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3481.0% | E511.9% | F24.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.4% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6362×
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Egle Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 9, 2024
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to properly store food items in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator, and 2) failed to have a process in place to determine the expiration date of food procured from vendors. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On [DATE] at 10:35 AM, accompanied by Staff #7, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), an initial tour of the kitchen by two surveyors identified the following concerns: 1) An observation of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed there was an uncovered, large rectangle, shallow pan that appeared to be filled with cooked food product. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Oct 9, 2025
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents or resident representatives with written notice of transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for hospital transfers.The findings include:On 10/06/25 at 4:10 PM, the Surveyor conducted a closed record review for Resident #66 related to a hospital transfer. A progress note dated 9/24/25 documented that staff heard a loud thump and found the resident (#66) on the bathroom floor. It was determined that the resident had fallen and was transferred to the hospital following an assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657May 9, 2024
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment. This was evident for 1 (#39) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents, and 1 (#45) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF693May 9, 2024
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the head of bed (HOB) was properly elevated for a resident during medication administration and infusion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) feeding. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The findings include: A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube is placed into the stomach through an opening in the stomach wall. If one cannot eat or drink all the nutrients they need, liquids such as formula, fluids, and medicines are put through the PEG tube. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Oct 9, 2025
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify Lap Buddy as a physical restraint, assess the resident for its use, and provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation for its continued use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #26) or 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints. The findings include:A lap buddy is a cushion placed in a resident's wheelchair between the armrest and in front of the resident. A lap buddy is considered a physical restraint when it is attached to a wheelchair, preventing a resident from moving freely in the chair or getting up, and it cannot be easily removed. An observation on 10/1/2025 at 11:13 AM, noted Resident #26 sitting in a wheelchair by his/her bedside, with a lap buddy in front of him/her. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 9, 2025Standard and complaint18 findings
- May 9, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings
- Jan 7, 2020Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- May 16, 2019Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 14, 2017Standard4 findings
- Sep 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 2, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 11, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Mar 31, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 22, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jul 24, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Apr 15, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Nov 1, 2013Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2013—11 findings
- Feb 16, 2012—8 findings
- Feb 9, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 20, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction