Durgin Pines
Kittery, Maine · CCN 205132
16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 81
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- York
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 10, 2026
152 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.07 | 4.04 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.05 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.4% | 49.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,434 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1076.9% | E215.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B17.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5571×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Durgin Pines, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Mar 12, 2025
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, or appoint a surrogate, for 5 of 5 residents reviewed. (#10, #15, #18, #23, #47) Findings: 1. Resident #18 was admitted in January of 2025. A review of the entire electronic medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or provided the resident and/or resident representative with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 2. Resident #23 was admitted in February of 2025. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Mar 12, 2025
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each assessment for 7 of 9 reviewed for care planning. (Resident #1, #49, #40, #32, #13, #55 and #3). Findings: 1. On 3/10/25 at 11:34 a.m., during an interview, Resident #1 stated he/she is not invited or remembers having care plan meetings. Review of Resident #1's IDT care plan meeting notes stated IDTs occurred on 4/24/24, 7/24/24, 10/23/24, 11/22/24 and on 3/5/25. The medical record lacked evidence that he/she was invited and/or participated in his/her IDT meetings. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Nov 29, 2022
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to adequately supervise and completely investigate successful elopements of 2 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. (Resident's #1 and #2) This failure resulted in Resident #1 eloping from the secured unit resulting in a facility wide search. Resident #2 eloped from the skilled unit where, he/she was found outside on the walking path by a staff member. In addition, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate elopements to include root cause analysis. Findings: The Department of Licensing & Certification received the following facility reported incident reports: -On 11/16/22 at 04:00 Resident #1 eloped from the locked unit and was found in the facility entryway stuck between the double doors. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557Jun 10, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity regarding personal privacy. Facility staff exposed a resident's bare leg and wound dressing, and initiated a clinical dressing removal in a public area of the facility. This affected 1 of 1 resident observed for dignity during treatments (Resident #3 [R3]).Finding: On 6/9/26 at approximately 10:45 a.m., Resident #3 (R3) was observed sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses' station of the Marion's Way unit. R3's right pant leg was pulled up, exposing his/her bare lower leg and an active wound dressing. At the same time, Registered Nurse #1 (RN #1) was observed standing at the public nurses' station cutting the dressing off R3's right lower leg using bandage scissors. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Jun 10, 2026
Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of all the resident's pre- and post-discharge medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for discharge to the community (Resident #79).Finding: On review of Resident #79's clinical record, a surveyor noted an admission date of 5/6/26. The record indicated that on 5/13/26, Resident #79 and family decided to return to the resident's previous assisted living facility (ALF) with hospice services. On 5/15/26, Resident #79 discharged back to the ALF with referrals for hospice services. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 10, 2026Standard2 findings
- Mar 12, 2025Standard4 findings
- Apr 2, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 22, 2023Standard1 finding
- Nov 29, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jul 22, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jun 12, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jun 20, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Mar 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
- Dec 20, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 9, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 21, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 13, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 4, 2011—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction