Deficiency Index

Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Brooklyn, New York · CCN 335625

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
32
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
320
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CASSENA CARE
County
Kings
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 27, 2025

500 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.08—
Annual nurse turnover37.2%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$37,650 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1688.9%E15.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 32 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6762×

    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

  • F5681×

    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6361×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF584Jun 27, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the onsite visit for Complaint NY00384702, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperature levels. This was evident on four (4) of four (4) resident floors, where 55 out of 55 rooms sampled had temperatures above the Federal and State requirements in accordance with 42 CFR Part 483 and 10 NYCRR: 415.29. Specifically, room [ROOM NUMBER] was 105 degrees Fahrenheit, room [ROOM NUMBER] was 102 degrees Fahrenheit, and Resident #1 room [ROOM NUMBER] temperature reading was 96 degrees Fahrenheit. Three (3) complaints were submitted to the State Agency regarding high temperatures throughout the facility from 06/24/2025 through 06/25/2025, stating all residents were affected. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Jun 27, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated and partial extended survey, complaint # NY00384702, it was determined that administration failed to ensure that the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident on four (4) of four (4) residents floors, where 55 out of 55 rooms sampled had temperatures above the Federal and State requirements. Specifically, on 06/25/2025 at 11:10 AM the temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 105 degrees Fahrenheit, room [ROOM NUMBER] was 102 degrees Fahrenheit, and Resident #1 room [ROOM NUMBER] temperature reading was 96 degrees Fahrenheit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Apr 10, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 04/03/2025 to 04/10/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #274) out of 4 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #274 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 3 liters per minute without a Physician's order. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Transcription and Order Entry into PCC (Point Click Care) with effective date 6/15 documented that all resident orders must be entered into the electronic medical record to appear in the resident's medication profile. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Jan 10, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 1/3/2024 to 1/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive resident assessments were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date. This is evident for 1 of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #226's annual Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed within 14 days. The findings are: The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set Assessment Version 3.0 dated 12/2023 documented the Minimum Data Set Department will complete audit reports to review for quality data and timeliness of Minimum Data Set completion. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF638Jan 10, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/03/2024 to 01/10/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were assessed using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State every 3 months. This was evident in 3 (Residents #62, #70 and #145) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments for Residents #62, #70, and #145 were not completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date. The findings are: The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated ,d+[DATE] documented audit reports will be completed to review for timeliness of completion. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 27, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 10, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Oct 29, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 24, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2013—3 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Apr 24, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction