Deficiency Index

Countryside Care & Rehabilitation

Rupert, Idaho · CCN 135064

14 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
107
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
36
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Minidoka · rural
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 10, 2025

425 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.665.09
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.94—
Annual nurse turnover97.9%35.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1263.2%E210.5%F421.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C15.3%
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 107 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Countryside Care & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Feb 5, 2021

    Based on observation, policy review, review of resident and staff COVID-19 testing logs, review of manufacturers' instructions, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were consistently and appropriately implemented to provide a safe and sanitary environment when: * Glucometers (devices used to check residents' blood sugar level) were not effectively cleaned and disinfected between residents and were not handled and transported appropriately. This placed 3 of 3 diabetic residents (#6, #12, and #13) in the facility, and any resident who received blood glucose testing in the facility, at risk of infection due to cross contamination. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to ensure staff wore beard nets in the kitchen and appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, documented, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Sep 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, Department of Health and Welfare - Idaho Administrative rules, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code review, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans were properly closed with lids to minimize attracting pests and rodents into the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. This placed residents and staff at risk of potential food contamination from bugs and rodents that may enter the kitchen due to the open garbage containers. Findings include:Department of Health and Welfare - Idaho Administrative Rules 16.03.02. Environmental Sanitation 108. Garbage and Refuse 03a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 19, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly sanitize the thermometer used to take temperatures of the food. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illnesses and infection for all residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Taking Accurate Temperatures, indicated that the probe should be cleaned, rinsed, sanitized, and air-dried before taking temperatures and immediately cleaned and re-sanitized after taking the temperature of each food. During an observation of the tray line on 09/18/24 at 11:30 AM, Cook1 was observed to take the thermometer out of her pocket and take the temperature of the food without sanitizing the thermometer before use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Sep 10, 2025

    Based on record review, State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 1 of 12 Residents (Resident #3) whose records were reviewed for Advance Directive. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning. Findings include:According to Appendix PP: DEFINITIONS S483.10(c)(6), (c)(8), (g)(12) Physician Orders for Life -Sustaining Treatment (POLST).a POLST form is not an advance directive. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 107 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 10, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Sep 19, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Feb 5, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2020Infection control2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2020Standard7 findings
  • Sep 28, 2018Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • May 4, 2017Standard8 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 29, 2013—5 findings
  • May 25, 2012—16 findings
  • Aug 3, 2011—3 findings
  • Apr 1, 2011Standard27 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction