Corn Heritage Village and Rehab of Weatherford

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Corn Heritage Village and Rehab of Weatherford, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 5, 2025

  On [DATE] at 4:27 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an Immediate Jeopardy Situation. The facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement. Resident #1 resided on the memory unit. A quarterly resident assessment, dated [DATE], showed Resident #1 had moderate cognition impairment, had no wandering behavior seven days prior to the assessment, could walk 150 feet, and had a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #1's care plan, dated [DATE], showed they were at risk for elopement. Behavior notes showed Resident #1 had been experiencing increased behaviors. On [DATE], Resident #1 was getting dressed and stated they had to get out because their daughter died . There were no interventions implemented after the increased behaviors. […]

• Actual harm, patternF689Jun 24, 2022

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions and supervision were in place to prevent accident hazards including falls, elopement, and [CONDITION(S)], for five (#12, 19, 23, 29, and #56) of five residents reviewed for accidents and falls. The facility failed to ensure: a. steps to prevent reoccurrence of falls were put in place for Res #12, 29, and #56. Res #56 sustained a laceration to their head which required sutures. Resident #12 had sustained a hematoma to her forehead. Res #29 sustained a skin tear from a fall on 01/23/22, a bruise to the right side of his head on 05/06/22, and a laceration to his scalp on 05/09/22. b. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Jan 23, 2025

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours for two (#47 and #218) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:00 p.m. with diagnoses which included dementia and unspecified mood [affective] disorder. The baseline care plan for Resident #47 documented an implementation date of 01/06/25 at 9:40 a.m. A total of 63.75 hours following the resident's admission. 2. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Nov 1, 2023

  Based on record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide restorative services for one (#49) of two sampled residents reviewed for restorative services. The DON identified 39 residents received restorative services and the resident census was 66. Findings: Resident #39 had diagnoses which included repeated falls and a fracture of the right femur. A physical therapy Restorative Care Program form, dated 10/21/22, documented Resident #49 was to receive restorative services three times a week as tolerated. ARestorative Care Flow Record, dated 09/03/23 through 09/30/23 did not document Resident #49 had received restorative services for five of twelve opportunities. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF582Jun 24, 2022

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide letters of NOMNC to two (#50 and #56) of three residents reviewed who were reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. Page three of the entrance conference worksheet documented seven residents were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the last six months. Findings: 1. Res #50 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/11/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 04/06/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #50 with a NOMNC letter. 2. Res #56 was admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/25/22, discharged from Part A skilled services on 04/22/22, and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide Res #56 with a NOMNC letter. […]