Deficiency Index

Bradbury Commons

Ponca City, Oklahoma · CCN 375521

22 surveys since 2010, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
116
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
12
The record, 2010–2023
’10’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy12

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Kay · rural
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 11, 2019

2,678 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG114.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD342.9%E342.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 116 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bradbury Commons, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF880Aug 15, 2022

    On 08/10/22, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to have an effective infection control program to properly prevent and/or contain the spread of COVID-19. Staff members were not conducting COVID-19 screenings. Staff were not utilizing proper PPE when caring for COVID-19 positive residents and were not wearing face masks properly. COVID-19 positive resident rooms did not have the appropriate transmission based precautions signage and staff were not able to identify which residents were COVID-19 positive. COVID-19 testing was not conducted per facility policy and CDC/CMS guidance for staff and residents. The facility had no tracking of signs and symptoms of COVID-19 to ensure proper isolation timeframes. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Mar 21, 2023

    A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 02/21/23 related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident was administered medication as ordered in the discharge instructions. The facility failed to ensure Plavix and Aspirin were not continued upon admission when the Resident had a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hematoma. (A serious condition where blood collects between the skull and the surface of the brain.) Resident #1's CT scan of the head, dated 03/04/23 documented the resident's subdural hematoma had increased in size and had an increased right to left midline shift which measured 1.4 cm. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Sep 22, 2022

    On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to notify the physician when a resident had an abnormal blood pressure and medication was held. Resident #1 had blood pressure readings of ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE], and ,d+[DATE]. Resident #1' medical record revealed the physician was not notified when the resident's blood pressure was low and when the cardiac medication was held. Resident #1 had a [CONDITION(S)] on [DATE] which resulted in death on [DATE]. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Sep 22, 2022

    On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor and intervene when a resident had an abnormal blood pressure. Resident #1 had blood pressure readings of ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE], ,d+[DATE], and ,d+[DATE]. Resident #1' medical record revealed the blood pressure was not rechecked, the resident was not assessed, and the physician had not been notified of the blood pressure readings. Resident #1 had a [CONDITION(S)] on [DATE] which resulted in death on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF563Sep 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of residents to receive visitors for one ( #1) of three residents reviewed for visitation. The ADON identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] An Admission Assessment, dated 09/06/21, read in part, the resident's cognition was intact and they required a walker for mobility. A care plan, read in part, the resident was at risk for isolation related to a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] A nursing note, dated 09/17/21, read in part, Pt has been dc'd from the COVID unit et moved to room (# withheld) . On 09/30/21 at 11:40 a.m., resident #1 was asked if she had received visitors. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 116 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 21, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 3, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 22, 2022Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 15, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard7 findings · 1 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Apr 18, 2018Standard28 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 3, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Jul 24, 2017Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard8 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 1, 2016Complaint7 findings
  • Nov 18, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Sep 10, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Nov 5, 2013—5 findings
  • Sep 17, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2012—4 findings
  • Oct 6, 2011—3 findings
  • Nov 9, 2010—5 findings
  • Sep 16, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction