Deficiency Index

Continuing Healthcare at Cedar Hill

Zanesville, Ohio · CCN 366286

32 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
165
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CERTUS HEALTHCARE
County
Muskingum · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 1, 2026

131 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.58—
Annual nurse turnover38.3%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$30,227 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.8%K—L—
Actual harmG11.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4072.7%E916.4%F47.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 55 of the 165 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6443×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Continuing Healthcare at Cedar Hill, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 5, 2024

    Based on closed medical record review, review of a facility fall investigation, hospital record review, review of the facility Fall policy and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident #78 adequate assistance for transferring/ambulation with toileting to prevent a fall with major injury. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on [DATE] when Resident #78, who was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation status post hospitalization for a left total knee replacement (on [DATE]) and who was assessed to be at moderate risk for falls sustained a fall while being assisted by one State tested Nursing Assistant, (STNA) #176 to walk from her bed to the bathroom. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 30, 2024

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, policy review, facility investigation review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent a resident fall with major injury. Actual Harm occurred on 06/24/24 when Resident #14, who was identified as a fall risk, was hit by a dietary cart (used to transport resident meal trays) that was being steered by Dietary [NAME] #20, causing the resident to fall and sustain a right hip fracture. The resident was emergently transported to the hospital and admitted for surgical intervention to repair the right hip fracture. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 23, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store perishable items under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. All residents were identified as receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observations of the walk in freezer on 01/21/25 at 8:18 A.M. revealed several undated/unlabeled items which were later identified by Dietary [NAME] #205 as follows: four bags of hash browns removed from their original packaging and now stored in a two-gallon plastic storage bags, a bag of tater tots removed from their original packaging which had been opened and were now stored in a two-gallon plastic storage bag, one bag of chicken tenders removed from their original packaging and now… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 13, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review for food storage and hand hygiene, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored and meal trays were prepared in a sanitary manner. This affected all residents residing in the facility at this time. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Observation on 07/10/23 at 8:11 A.M. revealed during initial tour of the kitchen, there were bags of food located in the walk-in freezer that was not properly sealed. There was one bag of breaded chicken tenders, one bag of tater tots, and one bag of french fries. All three bags were noted to be open with the food exposed to the open air. Interview on 07/10/23 at 8:50 A.M. with Dietary Manager #342 confirmed the three open bags of food. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Jul 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the clean laundry room, which had a gas powered dryer, had a carbon monoxide detector. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 07/13/23 at 8:30 A.M. of the clean laundry room revealed there were two dryers, one electric powered and one gas powered. Further observation revealed no carbon monoxide detector in the laundry room. Interview on 07/13/23 at 8:40 A.M. with Housekeeping Staff #347 revealed she had never seen a carbon monoxide detector in the clean laundry room with the gas dryer. Interview on 07/13/23 at 9:00 A.M. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 165 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 1, 2026Standard13 findings
  • Dec 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jul 30, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Jan 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2021Standard20 findings
  • Mar 30, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 1, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • Feb 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2019Standard and complaint19 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 24, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 8, 2018Standard and complaint20 findings
  • Dec 30, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Sep 7, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jul 2, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 22, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2013—11 findings
  • Apr 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2012—20 findings
  • Dec 7, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction