Continuing Care at Brooksby Village
Peabody, Massachusetts · CCN 225767
17 surveys since 2012, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 50
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 104
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 23 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jan 21, 2026
292 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.02 | 3.94 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.54 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 35.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $167,099 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H15.9% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1164.7% | E423.5% | F15.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Continuing Care at Brooksby Village, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF684Dec 23, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided treatments in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #12: 1. The facility failed to ensure a wound clinic appointment was re-scheduled to obtain new wound treatment interventions when requested by the Nurse Practitioner for a deteriorating right lower extremity wound, resulting in the wound continuing to deteriorate. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Jul 20, 2022
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Comprehensive Plan of Care (POC) indicated he/she required two or more staff members assistance with care needs, including incontinence care, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions from his/her POC to have two or more staff members present to assist during care. On 7/02/22, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided incontinent care to Resident #1 unassisted by an another staff person, as CNA #1 rolled Resident #1 onto his/her side during care, he/she slid out of bed, and fell on to the floor landing between the bed and the wall. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 20, 2022
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who required two or more staff assistance for care needs, including incontinence care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the required level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety and prevent incident/accident resulting in injury. On 7/02/22, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided incontinence care to Resident #1 unassisted by a second staff person, as CNA #1 rolled Resident #1 onto his/her side, he/she slid out of bed and fell to the floor, landing between the bed and the wall. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF944Dec 23, 2024
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement mandatory training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for 15 employees. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/1/24, failed to indicate mandatory QAPI training. Review of 15 employee education files for 5 certified nurse assistants (CNAs) and 10 licensed nurses indicated: - 0 out of 15 direct care employees had documentation they had completed QAPI training during their employment. During an interview on 12/23/24 at 9:03 A.M., the Administrator said the facility does not provide any QAPI training to employees.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Dec 23, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified experience for Residents on one of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff did not speak a foreign language while in the presence of, and while providing care for, Residents on the Terrace unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Rights - Continuing Care, dated June 2023, indicated the following: - Residents have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. During the Resident group meeting on 12/19/24 at 1:30 P.M., three out of three primarily English-speaking Residents said that staff have spoken in a foreign language to each other in front of them. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 50 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 21, 2026Standard5 findings
- Jun 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 23, 2024Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 20, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 13, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jul 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 13, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Apr 11, 2019Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 24, 2018Standard11 findings
- Mar 26, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Mar 1, 2017Standard1 finding
- May 3, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 4, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jul 12, 2013Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 14, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 16, 2012—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction