Deficiency Index

Cherokee Park Rehabilitation

Louisville, Kentucky · CCN 185237

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
98
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
104
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
County
Jefferson
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2025

488 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.343.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.90—
Annual nurse turnover58.2%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,054 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.9%K—L—
Actual harmG411.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2468.6%E514.3%F12.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 98 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cherokee Park Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF695Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy (trach) care and tracheal suctioning were provided consistent with professional standards of practice, and infection control processes for two of three residents (R) observed for tracheostomy care out of the 23 sampled residents, R54 and R61. 1. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 failed to: assess R54 after noting the oxygen saturation was 77% initially and the repeat reading was 66%; failed to suction R54 when the resident expectorated mucous after removal of the inner cannula and before the new cannula was replaced to ensure the airway was clear from mucous; and failed to have a Yankaur suction tip connected to the suction machine, an Ambu-bag present in… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF676Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure, two of nine residents (R) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of the total sample of 23 residents (R55 and R58) were provided restorative care and services to maintain their highest level of functioning resulting in a decline in function. In an interview with R55 she stated the facility cut its restorative care program in 2021. R55 and R58 declined in their ability to transfer, from being able to use a standing lift, in which they stood and participated in the transfer, to requiring the use of a Hoyer mechanical lift (lift designed to lift and transfer patients from one place to another) which was performed entirely by staff and without the residents' participation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance repeatedly voiced by the resident group for five out of five residents (R)38, R87, R13, R43, and R77, who attended the resident group interview, and for three additional residents, R55, R9, and R22 for a total of eight residents out of 23 sampled residents. The microwave used for reheating residents' food was removed by staff and no other mechanism was put into place to heat residents' food. This created the potential for dissatisfaction with meals and decreased quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF577Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, review of the monthly resident council meeting minutes and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of where to locate the state survey inspection results and ensure the results were available for review for five residents (R) out of the 23 sampled residents, R38, R13, R87, R43, and R77. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 03/22/2022, revealed, Resident rights .The resident has a right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State Surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for ten out of 44 (23 sampled and 21 supplemental) total residents (R), R77, R38, R43, R13, R87, R63, R75, R55, R22, R9. Five interviewable residents (R77, R38, R43, R13, and R87), selected by the facility, in a resident group meeting all expressed concerns about the facility's food which included hot food being served cold and lacking seasoning. Five additional residents interviewed (R63, R75, R55, R22, and R9) voiced the same type of complaints. Observation of a test tray with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed hot food temperatures were below 121 degrees Fahrenheit (F)and cold foods were above 50 degrees F. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 98 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
  • May 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2019Standard22 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 19, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 15, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Jun 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • May 3, 2017Complaint4 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 6, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard3 findings
  • May 13, 2016Complaint10 findings
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Sep 13, 2013—4 findings
  • Dec 6, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2011—16 findings
  • Apr 29, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction