Deficiency Index

Chelsea Place Care Center LLC

Hartford, Connecticut · CCN 075299

50 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
191
Surveys
50
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file33/50

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
216
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ICARE HEALTH NETWORK
County
Capitol
Medicare-certified since
1983

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

May 28, 2026

165 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.863.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover23.6%35.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K11.6%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4572.6%E914.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B46.5%C34.8%
CMS’s current file: 62 of the 191 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5505×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5844×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chelsea Place Care Center LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jan 5, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policy, and staff/security interviews for two of two residents reviewed for opioid overdose risk (Residents #2 and #6), the facility failed to identify and control accident hazards and provide adequate supervision and safety interventions for residents with known opioid use disorder-by admitting Resident #6 with recent fentanyl use without establishing a completed, risk based plan of care with specific controls (e.g., supervised visits, random room searches, visitor log management, random urine toxicology, and documented substance use disorder (SUD) support/refusal handling), by lacking an overdose/Narcan protocol, by failing to contact law enforcement when illegal drugs were suspected or observed, and by failing to maintain chain of… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF657Jun 21, 2021

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was reviewed for a comprehensive plan of care, the facility failed to revise the resident's plan of care and implement a level of supervision to protect the resident when the resident consistently expressed a desire for discharge against the wishes of the conservator. The finding includes: Resident (R) #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A review of R#1's clinical record identified Person #1 as R#1's conservator. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified R#1's desire to be discharged from the facility to community-based living. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 21, 2021

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not able to exit through a window when the resident broke the window stoppers, removed the window and climbed out the forth floor window and was found deceased on the ground. The finding includes: Resident (R) #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid [CONDITION(S)] and anxiety. A review of R#1's clinical record identified Person #1 as R#1's conservator. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified R#1's desire to be discharged from the facility to community-based living. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF923Aug 18, 2026

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility had adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. The findings include:Observations of the facility on all days of the survey 8/11, 8/12, 8/13, 8/17 and 8/18/26 identified 4 floors to the facility. Entry to the facility on the 1st floor containing administration and nursing offices and a large recreation room. Resident rooms were present on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors of the facility. All resident rooms on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors of the facility had screws in the windows that prevented them from being opened at all. Some of the windows did not have screens in them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Aug 18, 2026

    Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 4 of 9 sampled residents (Residents #9, #87, #162 and #216)) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that the methadone orders in the clinical record matched the orders from the methadone clinic who supplies the bottled methadone being administered to the residents, and failed to ensure suboxone administration was conducted according to professional standards. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 191 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 18, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
  • May 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2026Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2024Complaint4 findings
Show the 42 earlier surveys
  • Nov 8, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Oct 23, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 22, 2024Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 14, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 11, 2022Standard10 findings
  • Jun 21, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Feb 21, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 18, 2019Standard14 findings
  • Jun 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 3, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Mar 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Nov 10, 2016Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 31, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Mar 9, 2016Complaint5 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Apr 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 3, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Aug 22, 2013—8 findings
  • Nov 6, 2012—6 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—7 findings
  • Jun 16, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction