Cedarcrest Care Center
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma · CCN 375233
24 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 106
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 89
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Tulsa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 68 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Mar 5, 2026
249 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.20 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.5% | 55.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1657.1% | E932.1% | F310.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5521×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cedarcrest Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727May 27, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day for 2 (Quarter 3 2024 and Quarter 4 2024) of 4 PBJ reports reviewed for RN coverage. The DON identified 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 04/01/24 through 06/30/24, showed during quarter three the facility did not have RN coverage for 04/15/24, 04/21/24, 04/27/24, 06/15/24, 06/22/24, or 06/23/24. A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 07/01/24 through 09/30/24, showed during quarter four the facility did not have RN coverage for 08/03/24, 08/04/24, 08/11/24, 09/28/24, or 09/29/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF732May 27, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure daily staffing was posted in a place which was readily accessible to residents and visitors for three (05/20/25, 05/21/25, and 05/22/25) of four days during the survey. The DON identified 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/20/25 at 12:30 p.m., posted daily nurse staffing was not observed. On 05/22/25 at 11:53 a.m., posted daily nurse staffing was not observed. On 05/22/25 at 11:54 a.m., the DON stated they kept daily nurse staffing behind the two nurses stations at the facility. They stated they did not post the information in an area which was accessible to residents or visitors.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838May 27, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility-wide assessment had been completed annually. The DON identified 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Facility-Wide Assessment showed the date of the assessment was 07/18/22. On 05/20/25 at 11:54 a.m., during the entrance conference, the facility assessment was requested from the DON and the resident care coordinator. On 05/22/25 at 12:22 p.m., the DON stated they had forgotten to provide the facility assessment and was not sure what the facility assessment was. On 05/22/25 at 12:28 p.m., the business office manager stated they would check with the administrator for an updated facility assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726Mar 5, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure initial competencies were completed upon hire for 3 (CNA #5, CNA 10, and CNA #11) of 6 sampled employees reviewed for staff competencies.The DON identified 14 licensed staff members that should have initial competencies completed.Findings:1.The employee file for CNA #5 showed a hire date of 04/11/25 and a competency/skills checklist was not completed upon hire. 2. The employee file for CNA #10 showed a hire date of 12/02/25 and a competency/skills checklist was not completed upon hire.3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF570May 27, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a bond equal to or in excess of the resident trust account balance. The business office manager identified 23 residents with funds in the facility's resident trust fund. Findings: On 05/27/25, three months of bank statements for the residents' trust was reviewed. The bank statements showed February 2025's highest daily balance was $90,899.45, March 2025's highest daily balance was $97,788.97, and April 2025's highest balance was $109,822.58. On 05/27/25 at 5:20 p.m., the business office manager provided evidence of a surety bond in the amount of $10,000.00. On 05/27/25 at 5:20 p.m., the business office manager stated the bond did not cover the residents' trust balance.
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 106 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
- Mar 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 23, 2024Complaint5 findings
- Feb 23, 2024Standard3 findings
- Nov 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2023Standard4 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Dec 13, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Aug 3, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Oct 29, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 25, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
- Aug 1, 2018Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 30, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Sep 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 31, 2017Standard12 findings
- Apr 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2016Standard10 findings
- Sep 23, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Feb 20, 2015Standard6 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 27, 2012—4 findings
- Jul 7, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction