Shanoan Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation
Chickasha, Oklahoma · CCN 375362
18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 91
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 82
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Grady
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 68 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Mar 25, 2026
229 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.09 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 73.8% | 55.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1562.5% | E729.2% | F14.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F8032×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Shanoan Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF803Mar 25, 2026
On 03/24/26, a past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to have existed related to the facility's failure to ensure Res #3 received a mechanically soft diet without bread per physician order. Res #3 was provided a grilled cheese sandwich and side salad for an evening meal, which resulted in a choking episode requiring emergency services.On 03/24/26 at 3:15 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to ensure residents received physician ordered therapeutic diets.On 03/24/26 at 3:28 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation.Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a physician ordered mechanical soft… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 18, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility identified 48 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 04/15/24 at at 8:21 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. [NAME] # 1 was observed to take the trash out of the trash can and the trash was taken outside. [NAME] #1 was observed to return to the kitchen and did not wash their hands. [NAME] #1 placed a lid on the chicken, which was on the prep counter in marinade, and then placed the container in the refrigerator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Apr 18, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered to formulate an advance directive, or implemented the choice to formulate an advanced directive, for three (#8, 20, and #42) and posted the correct information regarding code status for one (#2) for 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, COPD, and chronic pain. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/27/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with most ADLs. On 04/15/24 at 10:55 a.m., a green name tag, indicating full code status, was observed by the resident room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Apr 18, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for two (#35 and #40) of three residents sampled for abuse. a. On 10/19/23, an initial Incident Report documented CNA #1 did place their hand over the mouth and nose of the Res #35 on 3 different occasions during a shower. It was also reported that CNA #1 told the resident to shut up. All those involved were suspended until the investigation was complete. CNA #1 was separated from employment immediately and CNA #2 was educated one-on-one related to reporting abuse immediately. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Apr 18, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. The facility identified 48 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 04/17/24 at 11:00 a.m., the menu was observed and documented the noon meal was to have been french onion pork chops, pork gravy, white cheddar mac and cheese, green peas, wheat dinner roll, margarine, apple [NAME], milk, and coffee. On 04/17/24 at 11:10 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to obtain the temperature of the pork chops when they were removed form the oven. The temperature at that time was 184 degrees F. The pork chops were place in a deep pan and then placed on the steam table. The other food items were not observed to be temped before placing on the steam table. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 91 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 25, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 30, 2025Standard2 findings
- Apr 18, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 6, 2023Standard6 findings
- May 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 7, 2021Standard4 findings
- Aug 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 10, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jun 4, 2018Standard3 findings
- Mar 15, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jan 14, 2016Standard1 finding
- Feb 12, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 9, 2014—4 findings
- Feb 7, 2013—7 findings
- May 17, 2012—5 findings
- Nov 17, 2011—11 findings
- Aug 2, 2011—3 findings
- Jan 27, 2011—17 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction