Deficiency Index

Cascadia of Boise

Boise, Idaho · CCN 135146

12 surveys since 2018, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
93
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2018–2026
’18’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE
County
Ada
Medicare-certified since
2018

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 24 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Idaho.

Last survey on record

May 13, 2026

180 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.973.74
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover48.0%47.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$13,049 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2583.3%E413.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 93 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cascadia of Boise, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 22, 2023

    Based on policy review, I&A review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for residents to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #21) whose records were reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #21. Findings include: The facility's Accidents and Supervision to Prevent Accidents policy, revised on 10/15/22, stated facilities were obligated to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Adequate supervision was determined by assessing the appropriate level of care and number of staff required, the competency of the staff, and the frequency of supervision needed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jun 11, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were met related to management of wounds, medication administration, failure to notify the physician of a change in condition, and failure to apply skin protection to prevent skin breakdown. This was true for 4 of 13 residents (#1, #4, #11 and #13) reviewed for treatment and care. Specifically: * Resident #4 was harmed when the facility did not assess, monitor and treat her abdominal wound according to professional standards of practice which resulted in hospitalization . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Jun 11, 2021

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents end-of-life pain management needs and preferences were effectively assessed, treated, and integrated into the residents' individualized care plans. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for pain management. Resident #2's pain related to his terminal cancer was not effectively managed to maintain his comfort the days prior to, and during, the final hours of his life, resulting in excruciating breakthrough pain. Findings include: The facility's Palliative Care policy, dated 11/20/17, documented palliative care is primarily directed at providing relief to a terminally ill person through symptom management. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 2, 2021

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was sufficiently assessed after a fall and failure to notify the physician after a medication error occurred for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #3 and #5) whose records were reviewed. This resulted in the potential for residents to experience adverse effects from a neurological injury and medications. Findings include: 1. The facility's Care Plan policy, revised 11/28/19, stated staff were to implement immediate interventions to prevent falls, determine whether the resident experienced head trauma requiring further diagnostic evaluation to rule out a subdural hematoma, perform neurologic assessments, investigate the fall, revise the plan of care, and document the post-fall… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725May 13, 2026

    Based on resident interviews, representative interviews, staff interviews, observations, review of grievances, and review of the three-week nursing schedule, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was available to meet resident needs according to their plan of care. This failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility if staff were not available to ensure resident needs and safety measures were provided. Findings include: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) website accessed on 5/13/26, article titled The National Imperative to Improve Nursing Home Quality (2022) documents, inadequate staffing contributes to delayed care, missed care tasks, and reduced resident safety. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 93 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 13, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 19, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Aug 8, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Mar 22, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Sep 22, 2023Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 10, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 11, 2021Complaint11 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 2, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Dec 2, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2019Standard38 findings · 5 harm
  • Aug 9, 2018Standard4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction