Deficiency Index

Shaw Mountain of Cascadia

Boise, Idaho · CCN 135090

25 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
156
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse10

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
108
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE
County
Ada
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 24 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Idaho.

Last survey on record

May 14, 2026

179 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.083.74
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.57—
Annual nurse turnover51.3%47.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,839 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2170.0%E413.3%F413.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 156 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6452×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Shaw Mountain of Cascadia, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF604Feb 9, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a lap tray was used to treat a medical symptom and not used as a physical restraint for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #78) who was observed for use of restraints. This resulted in harm to Resident #78 was left in a wheelchair with a lap tray for long periods which resulted in skin impairment and psychosocial distress. Findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior), anxiety disorder, and malnutrition. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 12, 2021

    Based on record review, policy review, Reportable Incident review, staff time card review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal and mental abuse. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident #3 being abused by a staff and the staff continuing to care for Resident #3, placing Resident #3 at risk if continued abuse and the other residents in the facility at risk of abuse. Findings include: The facility's policy for Preventing Abuse, released on 10/1/17 and revised on 7/13/18, documented the following: * The facility had processes in place to assist with preventing abuse. * Residents, visitors, and staff were observed to identify inappropriate behaviors. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 28, 2021

    Based on staff interview, review of facility policies, record review, and review of Incident & Accident (I&A) reports, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supervision of residents to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #9 when he had multiple falls and bruised and fractured his little finger. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program policy, revised 11/28/20, directed staff to identify residents who were at risk for falls and develop individual and practical care strategies based on assessed needs, implement the falls management program, provide ongoing assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of fall management and to complete a root cause analysis to determine the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 7, 2025

    Based on observation, review of the State Operations Manual, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained when 1) staff was assisting residents with meals and 2) medication administration, and 3) unsanitary conditions in the laundry room. This failure had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, updated 8/8/24, documented failure to change gloves and wash hands between tasks, such as medical treatments or contact with residents .can contribute to cross-contamination. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Feb 9, 2024

    Based on facility record review, review of the Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an RN on duty for at least eight consecutive hours daily. This was true for 4 of the 31 days reviewed for RN coverage. This created the potential for harm if routine and/or emergency nursing services went unmet and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Findings include: The Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report for Quarter 1, 2023, documented the facility had no RN coverage on Sunday 12/4/22, Saturday 12/17/22, Sunday 12/18/22, and Monday 12/26/22. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 156 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 14, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 7, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 21, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2021Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 28, 2021Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Oct 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jun 13, 2018Complaint6 findings
  • Jun 16, 2017Complaint15 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jan 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • May 15, 2015Complaint7 findings
  • Feb 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2014Standard15 findings
  • May 24, 2013—8 findings · 1 harm
  • May 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2012—10 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 3, 2011—5 findings
  • Jan 7, 2011—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction