Care One at New Bedford
New Bedford, Massachusetts · CCN 225650
20 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 83
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 154
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CAREONE
- County
- Bristol
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Aug 5, 2025
461 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.60 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.72 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.9% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1758.6% | E827.6% | F26.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B26.9% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Care One at New Bedford, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 30, 2023
Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to properly store and label food in the facility kitchen and on 3 out of 3 unit nourishment kitchens in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. properly label beverage items in 1 of 2 freestanding refrigerators in the kitchen, and b. ensure food and beverages were properly stored and labeled in 3 out of 3 unit nourishment kitchens. Findings include: a. On 1/23/23 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor, with Dietary Staff #1 present, observed seven trays of hard plastic cups filled with various liquids stored on shelving inside one of two stand up refrigerators. The cups/trays were not labeled as to when they were prepared or the use by dates. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF895Jan 30, 2023
Based on interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive Compliance and Ethics program as required. Findings include: During an interview on 1/30/23 at 2:42 P.M., the Administrator said the facility does not have a Compliance and Ethics program or committee and was unable to provide any written standards, policies and procedures for a Compliance and Ethics program. He said if there were any ethical concerns, they would use corporate's legal department. .
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF885Nov 10, 2022
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to notify residents, resident representatives, and families of positive COVID-19 cases (staff or resident) by 5:00 P.M. the following day as required. Findings include: During an interview on 11/10/22 at 8:50 A.M., the Administrator said the facility COVID-19 outbreak started on 10/30/22 when the first resident tested positive. He said that he was responsible for notifying all the residents and the family representatives and he sent out notification of the facility COVID-19 outbreak on 10/30/22. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Nov 10, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 outbreak management in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Perform contact tracing for six positive staff members to include all resident and staff exposure; and 2. Perform outbreak testing for COVID-19 as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Testing Staff, revised 9/22, included but was not limited to: -Close contact refers to someone who has been within six feet of a COVID-19 positive person for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Aug 5, 2025
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#57), out of a total sample of 27 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #57, to implement treatments from the wound consultant physician for an unstageable pressure ulcer (wound covered with necrotic (dead) tissue making it difficult to determine stage) of the coccyx.Findings include:Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/4/25, indicated he/she had an unhealed unstageable pressure ulcer and was receiving pressure ulcer/injury care.On 7/30/25 at 9:32 A.M., Resident #57… […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 83 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 5, 2025Standard7 findings
- Feb 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
- May 22, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jun 30, 2023Infection control1 finding
- Jan 30, 2023Standard17 findings
- Nov 10, 2022Infection control2 findings
- Jun 1, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Sep 10, 2020Complaint5 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Jul 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 12, 2019Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2018Standard15 findings
- May 3, 2017Standard13 findings
- Jul 11, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 19, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 3, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 20, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 3, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction