Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center
Peabody, Massachusetts · CCN 225048
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 68
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 152
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jan 30, 2025
648 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.14 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.84 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.0% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D685.7% | E— | F114.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 5, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff identified and addressed the deterioration of a shearing wound consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing for 1 Resident (#234) out of a total of 25 sampled Residents. Specifically, Resident #234's shearing wound deteriorated which resulted in the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer. Findings include: Review of the facility's Skin Integrity Management policy, revised March 16, 2022, indicated: *Based on a comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that the resident receives the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers, promote healing of all wounds, prevent… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Aug 23, 2022
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Hospital Discharge Summary included physician's orders for Potassium Chloride (mineral supplement) 40 millequivalents (meq) twice daily, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when due to a transcription error upon admission by nursing, Resident #1 was only administered Potassium Chloride 20 meq twice daily (half the amount ordered), as a result his/her Potassium level became critically low, he/she was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department, diagnosed with [CONDITION(S)] (low potassium level), required administration of intravenous potassium supplements, and was admitted . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Jan 12, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), was who assessed for the use of bilateral upper quarter side rails on his/her bed as enablers, had a physician's orders [REDACTED]. On 12/28/20, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, assisted Resident #1 with personal hygiene, Resident #1 attempted to roll onto his/her right side, however, there were no side rails installed on either side of the bed, Resident #1 rolled out of bed onto the floor, and sustained a right distal femur fracture, which required surgical intervention to repair. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 12, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), was who assessed for the appropriate use of bilateral upper quarter side rails, had a physician's orders [REDACTED]. On 12/28/20, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 assisted Resident #1 who was in bed, with personal hygiene, however there were no bilateral upper quarter side rails in place on the bed for Resident #1 to hold on to, as Resident #1 attempted to roll onto his/her right side in bed, he/she rolled off the bed onto the floor, and sustained a right distal femur fracture which required surgical intervention to repair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF909Jan 30, 2025
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to regularly inspect bed frames and mattress spacing to identify areas of potential entrapment. Specifically, the facility failed to regularly inspect and document findings regarding the seven zones of bed entrapment of Residents' beds for potential areas of entrapment as evidenced by a bed bolster (an object used to fill gaps between the mattress and headboard/footboard of a bed) that did not fit properly. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 68 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 30, 2025Standard6 findings
- Feb 29, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jan 5, 2023Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 18, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Oct 18, 2021Standard8 findings
- Jan 25, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jan 12, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Apr 25, 2019Standard8 findings
- Apr 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2018Standard7 findings
- Dec 23, 2016Standard2 findings
- Sep 30, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jul 31, 2013—9 findings
- Jul 26, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 6, 2011—1 finding
- Aug 4, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction