Deficiency Index

Briarfield at Ashley Circle

Youngstown, Ohio · CCN 365545

21 surveys since 2010, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
74
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Mahoning
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 25, 2025

410 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.703.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.45—
Annual nurse turnover32.1%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD770.0%E—F220.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B110.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 74 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Briarfield at Ashley Circle, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Sep 25, 2025

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were clearly identified for Resident #82 and failed to maintain appropriate infection surveillance. This affected one resident (#82) of three reviewed for infection control. The facility identified Resident #82 as the only resident on TBP. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 09/15/25. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone that can cause inflammation, pain, and damage), diabetes, cellulitis, and spinal stenosis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF837Dec 9, 2023

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of personnel files, review of Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Support (BELTSS) documentation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Administrator had a valid license. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of the Administrator's personnel file revealed no evidence the Administrator had a valid license from 01/01/23 to 11/22/23. Review of facility documentation revealed on 11/22/23 at 12:26 P.M., BELTSS Employee #100 called and reported the Administrator had not had a valid Long Term Healthcare Administrator license since 01/01/23. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 27, 2022

    Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control interventions were implemented to prevent the potential spread of COVID 19. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 01/24/22 between 11:17 A.M. and 11:27 A.M., Activity Assistant (AA) #100 was observed in the main dining room providing fluids to residents. AA #100 was observed using the palm of her hand and cupping the outside of her surgical mask to pull it away from her face while she was holding a cup of fluids to deliver to an unidentified resident. Without performing hand hygiene, AA #100 then provided clothing protectors to Residents #25 and #45. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Sep 25, 2025

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center regarding Resident #4's hemodialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#4) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. This had the potential to affect residents (#4, #21 and #41) identified by the facility who received dialysis. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed in admission date of 02/16/12. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, schizophrenia, hypertension, depression, and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF757Sep 25, 2025

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions for pain were attempted prior to the administration of opioid pain medication. This affected one resident (#4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed in admission date of 02/16/12. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, schizophrenia, hypertension, depression, and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. She required setup help for eating, oral and personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, and showering. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 74 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 25, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Dec 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Nov 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 27, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 6, 2020Standard4 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard5 findings
  • May 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Sep 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Jun 30, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Apr 16, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 11, 2013—8 findings
  • Sep 15, 2011Standard10 findings
  • Dec 2, 2010—5 findings
  • Nov 10, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction