Deficiency Index

Oak Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation

Baltic, Ohio · CCN 366254

8 surveys since 2010, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
58
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
85
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS
County
Holmes · rural
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 29, 2025

529 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover9.1%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD654.5%E436.4%F19.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 58 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oak Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jan 31, 2024

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of nursing schedules, employee time punch review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was scheduled for eight consecutive hours every day. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents. Findings include: Review of nursing schedules and time punches for the days dated 04/08/23, 04/09/23, 04/22/23, 05/06/23, 05/07/23, 05/20/23 and 06/17/23 revealed there was no registered nurse (RN) coverage for eight consecutive hours. During an interview on 01/30/24 at 1:43 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Feb 17, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all residents had clean linen and furniture in good repair. This affected five residents (#12, #23, #33, #45 and #76) of 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The following environmental concerns were identified during the annual recertification survey: a. On 02/14/22 at 1:43 P.M. interview with Resident #76 revealed concerns her bedspread and bed sheets were dirty. She said her sheets had only been changed three times since she arrived to the facility. The resident said she had spilled pop on her bedspread. On 02/14/22 at 1:45 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Feb 17, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the correct serving size was used during the preparation of the pureed protein (beef) on 02/15/22. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (#9, #42, #13, #52, #41, #7, #55, #22, #43, #63, #2, #44, #18, #72, #3, #38 and #34) of 17 residents who were ordered a pureed diet. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility provided menu spreadsheet, dated 11/17/21 revealed for the dinner meal on 02/15/22 residents on a pureed diet were to receive two #10 scoops (six ounces (oz)) of beef. On 02/15/22 beginning at 3:32 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Feb 17, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure milk served during the dinner meal on 02/15/22 to residents on the secured unit was served at a proper and palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#18, #72, #31, #5, #69, #5, #45, #23, #71, #60 and #3) of 41 residing on the secured unit who received milk with their evening meal. The facility census was 80. Findings include: On 02/15/22 at 4:40 P.M. a half gallon of milk was observed sitting on a paper towel on the counter of the small dining room on the secured unit. On 02/15/22 at 4:41 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Feb 17, 2022

    Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed protein (beef) was prepared at the correct consistency and prepared in a form to meet each residents needs. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (#9, #42, #13, #52, #41, #7, #55, #22, #43, #63, #2, #44, #18, #72, #3, #38 and #34) of 17 residents who were ordered a pureed diet. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the facility provided menu spreadsheet, dated 11/17/21 revealed for the dinner meal on 02/15/22 residents on a pureed diet were to receive two #10 scoops (six ounces (oz)) of beef. On 02/15/22 beginning at 3:32 P.M. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 58 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 29, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Jan 31, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Feb 17, 2022Standard8 findings
  • May 30, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 23, 2013—16 findings
  • Jan 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Nov 22, 2010—15 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction