Deficiency Index

Bradford Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation

Hopkinsville, Kentucky · CCN 185076

31 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
132
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
County
Christian
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 29, 2026

164 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.183.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover57.1%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2090.9%E—F29.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 22 of the 132 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bradford Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 90 of the facility's 94 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Observation during the initial kitchen tour revealed numerous food items in the reach-in cooler not labeled or dated. In addition, continued observation of the kitchen revealed [NAME] 2 failed to have a beard covering in place. Further observation revealed [NAME] 2 failed to utilize utensils when serving food, using his gloved hands and not changing gloves. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584May 29, 2026

    Observation, interview, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for residents related to peeling paint on the walls in room [ROOM NUMBER], holes in the wall in rooms [ROOM NUMBER], and stained ceiling tiles in rooms 100, 107, 109, and 119. This affected four (4) out of 20 sampled residents, R11, R12, R19, and R20.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Resident Rights Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed residents had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.Request for the facility's maintenance policy revealed that they didn't have any policies pertaining to maintenance of their building.Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/26/2026 at 4:00 PM revealed three (3) stained ceiling tiles in the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677May 29, 2026

    Observation, interview, and review of facility policies revealed the facility failed to provide assistance with incontinence care in a timely manner for four (4) of 10 sampled residents (R1, R6, R7, and R14).The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed residents had the right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of the resident's needs and preferences.Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living Policy, revised 04/2026, revealed residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living would receive the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene.Review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care Policy, reviewed 04/2026, revealed it was the practice of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF697May 29, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure pain assessments were completed prior to and after the administration of as needed (PRN) narcotic pain medications for four (4) out of four (4) sampled residents, Resident (R)4, R8, R16, and R18.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Pain Management Policy, revised 04/2026, revealed the facility would utilize a systematic approach for recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of pain. It further revealed, the facility would use a pain assessment tool, appropriate for the resident's cognitive status, to assist staff in consistent assessment of a resident's pain. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Apr 10, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications with expired or post discard dates were not available for resident use for one of four sampled residents (Resident (R) 1). Observation on 04/08/2026 revealed an intravenous (IV) antibiotic (Meropenem) container hanging on an IV pole in R1's room labeled with directions to discard the medication after 03/03/2026.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage last revision date of 02/01/2026, revealed A. Expiration dates (beyond-use date) of dispensed medications shall be determined by the pharmacist at the time of dispensing. B. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 132 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 29, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 10, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Sep 20, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Oct 26, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2020Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Nov 27, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Oct 14, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2018Standard5 findings · 2 harm
  • May 25, 2018Complaint7 findings
  • Apr 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 7, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 27, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard13 findings · 2 harm
  • May 9, 2016Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 17, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 12, 2015Standard14 findings
  • Apr 8, 2015Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 2, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2013—5 findings
  • Nov 28, 2012—2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2012—10 findings
  • Jan 28, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction