Deficiency Index

Hillcrest Health and Rehabilitation Center

Corbin, Kentucky · CCN 185125

19 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
55
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SEKY HOLDING CO.
County
Whitley · rural
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 22, 2025

444 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.313.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.78—
Annual nurse turnover60.0%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD9100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 55 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hillcrest Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Mar 4, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review and a review of the facility policy it was determined the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan developed for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) consistent with resident's needs. The facility assessed and determined Resident #2 required assistance for ambulation in the facility to minimize the risk of the resident sustaining falls and injuries. However, the facility failed to ensure all staff were knowledgeable regarding the resident's assessed needs and failed to ensure the intervention of assisting the resident with ambulation, which was detailed on the resident's Kardex, was implemented. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 4, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and falls were thoroughly investigated. The facility assessed Resident #2 as cognitively impaired, unsteady, and required extensive assistance of one (1) staff member for transfers and ambulation. The facility failed to identify Resident #2 had been assessed to require the assistance of staff for transfers and ambulation and allowed Resident #2 to ambulate unsupervised around the facility. Resident #2 experienced six (6) falls from 11/11/2021 through 02/28/2021, as a result of the falls the resident sustained [REDACTED]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 4, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify and isolate residents to properly prevent the spread of COVID-19 for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents. (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Observations and interviews revealed the facility failed to isolate Resident #2 and Resident #3 after returning to the facility from emergency room (ER) visits as outlined in the facility's policy. Observations also revealed housekeeping staff failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when cleaning an isolation room on 03/03/2021. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Aug 22, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse other residents for 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #38) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse.Findings included: A facility policy titled, “Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation Policy,” revised 01/2018, indicated, “Our facility does not condone or tolerate resident abuse (this includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse), neglect, misappropriation or exploitation under any circumstances by anyone, including staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving or visiting the resident, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, friends, or other individuals.” 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Aug 22, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse timely to the Director of Nursing and/or Administrator for 2 (Resident #38 and Resident #81) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Findings included: The facility policy titled, “Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation Policy,” revised 01/2018, indicated, “All allegations involving suspected abuse, neglect, misappropriation or exploitation including injuries of an unknown source or misappropriation of resident property shall be reported immediately, but not later 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 55 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 22, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 16, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Mar 4, 2021Infection control3 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jul 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2018Complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jan 18, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jan 7, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jan 24, 2013—1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2012—9 findings
  • Mar 6, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 6, 2011—1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2011—6 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction